Literature DB >> 11719126

Randomised controlled trials of staged teaching for basic life support: 2. Comparison of CPR performance and skill retention using either staged instruction or conventional training.

D Chamberlain1, A Smith, M Colquhoun, A J Handley, K B Kern, M Woollard.   

Abstract

Teaching CPR in stages is a strategy designed to improve skill acquisition and retention. This method has been compared with conventional teaching in a randomised trial involving 495 volunteers. The first ('bronze') stage was simplified by omitting ventilation and giving compressions in sets of 50 with pauses to open the victim's airway; in the second ('silver') stage ventilation was introduced in a ratio of 50 compressions to five breaths, and in the third ('gold') stage, the volunteers were converted to conventional CPR. 51% of those taught by this method reattended for the second ('silver') stage compared with 25% who were taught conventional CPR and advised to return for a revision session. 38% of the staged group reattended for the third ('gold') compared with 8% for the conventional group. Modest improvement in skill acquisition has earlier been reported for the 'bronze' stage teaching, and this has been followed by better performance in some of the components tested after the subsequent stages. Comparisons after the 'gold' stage were limited by the small numbers who reattended for a third session of conventional training, but no special difficulties were noted in changing the ratio of compressions to ventilation that was necessary to convert the staged training volunteers to conventional CPR. The increased number of compressions that can be achieved by teaching 'bronze' stage CPR with no ventilation was retained, to a lesser degree, when the 'silver' ratio of 50 compressions to five breaths was compared with the conventional 15:2 ratio. Our observations suggest that during the first critical 8 min of a resuscitation attempt, 58% more compressions might be delivered by using the 50:5 ratio - an increase that is likely to result in a significant augmentation of blood flow with important clinical implications. More comparative information will become available when the results of unannounced home testing are analysed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11719126     DOI: 10.1016/s0300-9572(01)00342-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  10 in total

1.  Cardiac arrest: composition of resuscitation teams and training techniques: results of a hospital survey in German-speaking countries.

Authors:  Sylvia Siebig; Sven Kues; Frank Klebl; Tanja Brünnler; Felix Rockmann; Jürgen Schölmerich; Julia Langgartner
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Easy-to-learn cardiopulmonary resuscitation training programme: a randomised controlled trial on laypeople's resuscitation performance.

Authors:  Rachel Jia Min Ko; Swee Han Lim; Vivien Xi Wu; Tak Yam Leong; Sok Ying Liaw
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 1.858

3.  Public knowledge of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in Republic of Slovenia.

Authors:  Renata Rajapakse; Marko Noč; Janko Kersnik
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 1.704

4.  Continuous chest compression cardiopulmonary resuscitation training promotes rescuer self-confidence and increased secondary training: a hospital-based randomized controlled trial*.

Authors:  Audrey L Blewer; Marion Leary; Emily C Esposito; Mariana Gonzalez; Barbara Riegel; Bentley J Bobrow; Benjamin S Abella
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  Factors influencing the willingness to perform bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation on the workplace: a study from North-Eastern Italy.

Authors:  Matteo Riccò; Mirco Berrone; Luigi Vezzosi; Giovanni Gualerzi; Chiara Canal; Giuseppe De Paolis; Gert Schallenberg
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2020-11-10

6.  Influence of learning styles on the practical performance after the four-step basic life support training approach - An observational cohort study.

Authors:  Hanna Schröder; Alexandra Henke; Lina Stieger; Stefan Beckers; Henning Biermann; Rolf Rossaint; Saša Sopka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training strategies in the times of COVID-19: a systematic literature review comparing different training methodologies.

Authors:  Daniyal Mansoor Ali; Butool Hisam; Natasha Shaukat; Noor Baig; Marcus Eng Hock Ong; Jonathan L Epstein; Eric Goralnick; Paul D Kivela; Bryan McNally; Junaid Razzak
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 2.953

8.  Effects of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation with Automated External Defibrillator Training among Schoolchildren in Slovenia: A Pre- and Post-test Cohort Study.

Authors:  Sanela Pivač; Brigita Skela-Savič; Primož Gradišek
Journal:  Zdr Varst       Date:  2021-03-18

9.  Four-stage teaching technique and chest compression performance of medical students compared to conventional technique.

Authors:  Matej Jenko; Maja Frangez; Aleksander Manohin
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.351

10.  Knowledge and attitudes towards cardiopulmonary resuscitation and defibrillation amongst Asian primary health care physicians.

Authors:  Marcus Eh Ong; Susan Yap; Kim P Chan; Papia Sultana; Venkataraman Anantharaman
Journal:  Open Access Emerg Med       Date:  2009-11-16
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.