Literature DB >> 11718975

Intubating laryngeal mask airway, laryngeal tube, 1100 ml self-inflating bag-alternatives for basic life support?

V Dörges1, V Wenzel, T Schumann, E Neubert, H Ocker, K Gerlach.   

Abstract

Insufficient oxygenation, ventilation and gastric inflation with subsequent regurgitation of stomach contents is a major hazard of bag-valve-face mask ventilation during the basic life support phase of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). The European Resuscitation Council has recommended smaller tidal volumes of approximately 500 ml as an effort to reduce gastric inflation; furthermore, the intubating laryngeal mask airway and the laryngeal tube have been recently developed in order to provide rapid ventilation and to secure the airway. The purpose of our study was to examine whether usage of a newly developed medium-size self-inflating bag (maximum volume, 1100 ml) in association with the intubating laryngeal mask airway, and laryngeal tube may provide adequate lung ventilation, while reducing the risk of gastric inflation in a bench model simulating the initial phase of CPR. Twenty house officers volunteered for our study. When using the laryngeal tube, and the intubating laryngeal mask airway, respectively, the medium-size (maximum volume, 1100 ml) versus adult (maximum volume, 1500 ml) self-inflating bag resulted in significantly (P<0.05) lower mean+/-S.E.M. lung tidal volumes (605+/-22 vs. 832+/-4 ml, and 666+/-27 vs. 887+/-37 ml, respectively), but comparable peak airway pressures. No gastric inflation occurred when using both devices with either ventilation bag. In conclusion, both the intubating laryngeal mask airway and laryngeal tube in combination with both an 1100 and 1500 ml maximum volume self inflating bag proved to be valid alternatives for emergency airway management in a bench model of a simulated unintubated cardiac arrest victim.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11718975     DOI: 10.1016/s0300-9572(01)00423-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  5 in total

1.  Using a laryngeal tube during cardiac arrest reduces "no flow time" in a manikin study: a comparison between laryngeal tube and endotracheal tube.

Authors:  Christoph H R Wiese; Utz Bartels; Anna Bergmann; Ingo Bergmann; Jan Bahr; Bernhard M Graf
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.704

2.  [Comparison between the laryngeal tubus S and endotracheal intubation. Simulation of securing the airway in an emergency situation].

Authors:  A Thierbach; T Piepho; B Kleine-Weischede; G Haag; M Maybauer; C Werner
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  [Reduction in no flow time using a laryngeal tube: comparison to bag-mask ventilation].

Authors:  C H R Wiese; J Bahr; A Bergmann; I Bergmann; U Bartels; B M Graf
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  [First clinical experiences with the new LTS. A laryngeal tube with an oesophageal drain].

Authors:  H Genzwürker; T Finteis; J Hinkelbein; K Ellinger
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2003-06-19       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  Influence of airway management strategy on "no-flow-time" during an "advanced life support course" for intensive care nurses - a single rescuer resuscitation manikin study.

Authors:  Christoph H R Wiese; Utz Bartels; Alexander Schultens; Tobias Steffen; Andreas Torney; Jan Bahr; Bernhard M Graf
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2008-04-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.