Literature DB >> 11718937

Chitosan for mucosal vaccination.

I M van der Lubben1, J C Verhoef, G Borchard, H E Junginger.   

Abstract

The striking advantage of mucosal vaccination is the production of local antibodies at the sites where pathogens enter the body. Because vaccines alone are not sufficiently taken up after mucosal administration, they need to be co-administered with penetration enhancers, adjuvants or encapsulated in particles. Chitosan easily forms microparticles and nanoparticles which encapsulate large amounts of antigens such as ovalbumin, diphtheria toxoid or tetanus toxoid. It has been shown that ovalbumin loaded chitosan microparticles are taken up by the Peyer's patches of the gut associated lymphoid tissue (GALT). This unique uptake demonstrates that chitosan particulate drug carrier systems are promising candidates for oral vaccination. Additionally, after co-administering chitosan with antigens in nasal vaccination studies, a strong enhancement of both mucosal and systemic immune responses is observed. This makes chitosan very suitable for nasal vaccine delivery. In conclusion, chitosan particles, powders and solutions are promising candidates for mucosal vaccine delivery. Mucosal vaccination not only reduces costs and increases patient compliance, but also complicates the invasion of pathogens through mucosal sites.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11718937     DOI: 10.1016/s0169-409x(01)00197-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev        ISSN: 0169-409X            Impact factor:   15.470


  55 in total

1.  Novel chitosan particles and chitosan-coated emulsions inducing immune response via intranasal vaccine delivery.

Authors:  Takahiro Nagamoto; Yoshiyuki Hattori; Kozo Takayama; Yoshie Maitani
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  Blood stage merozoite surface protein conjugated to nanoparticles induce potent parasite inhibitory antibodies.

Authors:  Kae Pusic; Hengyi Xu; Andrew Stridiron; Zoraida Aguilar; Andrew Wang; George Hui
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 3.641

3.  Drug Release and Targeting: the Versatility of Polymethacrylate Nanoparticles for Peroral Administration Revealed by Using an Optimized In Vitro-Toolbox.

Authors:  Susanne Beyer; Aline Moosmann; Astrid S Kahnt; Thomas Ulshöfer; Michael J Parnham; Nerea Ferreirós; Sylvia Wagner; Matthias G Wacker
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 4.200

4.  Mucosal immunization with high-mobility group box 1 in chitosan enhances DNA vaccine-induced protection against coxsackievirus B3-induced myocarditis.

Authors:  Maowei Wang; Yan Yue; Chunsheng Dong; Xiaoyun Li; Wei Xu; Sidong Xiong
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2013-09-11

5.  Studies on effect of pH on cross-linking of chitosan with sodium tripolyphosphate: a technical note.

Authors:  Devika R Bhumkar; Varsha B Pokharkar
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2006-06-02       Impact factor: 3.246

6.  Chitosan solution enhances both humoral and cell-mediated immune responses to subcutaneous vaccination.

Authors:  David A Zaharoff; Connie J Rogers; Kenneth W Hance; Jeffrey Schlom; John W Greiner
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2006-12-04       Impact factor: 3.641

7.  Intranasal vaccination with chitosan-DNA nanoparticles expressing pneumococcal surface antigen a protects mice against nasopharyngeal colonization by Streptococcus pneumoniae.

Authors:  Jianghong Xu; Wenjia Dai; Zhengmin Wang; Bing Chen; Zhongming Li; Xiaoyong Fan
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2010-11-03

Review 8.  Design opportunities for actively targeted nanoparticle vaccines.

Authors:  Tarek M Fahmy; Stacey L Demento; Michael J Caplan; Ira Mellman; W Mark Saltzman
Journal:  Nanomedicine (Lond)       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 5.307

9.  Differential adhesion of normal and inflamed rat colonic mucosa by charged liposomes.

Authors:  Tareq Taha Jubeh; Yechezkel Barenholz; Abraham Rubinstein
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 10.  Brucellosis: the case for live, attenuated vaccines.

Authors:  Thomas A Ficht; Melissa M Kahl-McDonagh; Angela M Arenas-Gamboa; Allison C Rice-Ficht
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 3.641

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.