Literature DB >> 11718196

Surface electromyography-verified muscular damage associated with the open dorsal approach to the lumbar spine.

M Kramer1, P Katzmaier, R Eisele, V Ebert, L Kinzl, E Hartwig.   

Abstract

The dorsal approach is increasingly preferred in the surgical treatment of vertebral fractures. However, the access and the implant's position cause muscle loss, which can lead to instability and a reduced capacity for rehabilitation. Morphological factors (bones, intervertebral discs) are typically blamed for chronic pain syndromes in the literature, while less importance is attached to functional factors (muscles). The objective of this study was therefore to investigate the isolated influence of dorsal spinal instrumentation on the back muscles by means of electromyography (EMG). A total of 32 patients with conditions after dorsal spondylodesis following the fracture of a vertebral body and 32 subjects with healthy backs were enrolled in this study. The EMG signal was recorded in three different muscle groups during isometric extension exercise. The evaluation was performed by comparing the mean rectified amplitudes of the three muscle groups in the patients and controls. The patients had significantly lower amplitudes in the multifidus muscle (MF) and significantly higher amplitudes in the iliocostal muscle (IL). Patients with severe pain were found to have lower electric muscle potentials in all investigated muscle groups than patients with mild pain. The muscle damage which was established in the multifidus muscle is compensated by increased activity in the iliocostal muscle. On the basis of anatomical considerations, the damage pattern can be identified as having been caused by surgery. It is extremely unlikely that trauma is the cause.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11718196      PMCID: PMC3611527          DOI: 10.1007/s005860100294

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  15 in total

1.  Comparison of open versus percutaneous pedicle screw insertion in a sheep model.

Authors:  W Lehmann; A Ushmaev; A Ruecker; J Nuechtern; L Grossterlinden; P G Begemann; T Baeumer; J M Rueger; D Briem
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Effect of the percutaneous pedicle screw fixation at the fractured vertebra on the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures.

Authors:  Kunpeng Li; Zhong Li; Xiaofeng Ren; Hui Xu; Wen Zhang; Dawei Luo; Jinzhu Ma
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  [Percutaneous dorsal versus open instrumentation for fractures of the thoracolumbar border. A comparative, prospective study].

Authors:  R Grass; A Biewener; A Dickopf; St Rammelt; J Heineck; H Zwipp
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Role of muscle damage on loading at the level adjacent to a lumbar spine fusion: a biomechanical analysis.

Authors:  Masoud Malakoutian; John Street; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Ian Stavness; Marcel Dvorak; Sidney Fels; Thomas Oxland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  A comparison of three different surgery approaches and methods for neurologically intact thoracolumbar fractures: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Chao Zhu; Bin Wang; Jian Yin; Xin Hui Liu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 2.359

6.  Pedicle screw fixation and posterior fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases: effects on individual paraspinal muscles and lower back pain; a single-center, prospective study.

Authors:  Jae-Ryong Cha; Yong-Chan Kim; Chulyoung Jang; Woo-Kyoung Yoo; Ji Hao Cui
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Quantitative MRI comparison of multifidus muscle degeneration in thoracolumbar fractures treated with open and minimally invasive approach.

Authors:  F Gilbert; T M Heintel; M G Jakubietz; H Köstler; C Sebald; R H Meffert; A M Weng
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 8.  Muscular changes after minimally invasive versus open spinal stabilization of thoracolumbar fractures: A literature review.

Authors:  Miguel Pishnamaz; Ulrike Schemmann; Christian Herren; Klemens Horst; Philipp Lichte; Frank Hildebrand; Hans-Christoph Pape; Philipp Kobbe
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.041

9.  Trunk Control Ability after Minimally Invasive Lumbar Fusion Surgery during the Early Postoperative Phase.

Authors:  Jwo-Luen Pao; Rong-Sen Yang; Chen-Hsi Hsiao; Wei-Li Hsu
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2014-08-30

10.  A Comparison of the Mini-Open Wiltse Approach with Pedicle Screw Fixation and the Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation for Neurologically Intact Thoracolumbar Fractures.

Authors:  Yong Fan; JiaNan Zhang; Xin He; YunFei Huang; QiNing Wu; DingJun Hao
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2017-11-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.