Literature DB >> 11717627

Assessing genetic risk: comparison between the referring obstetrician and genetic counselor.

K L Koscica1, J C Canterino, J T Harrigan, T Dalaya, C V Ananth, A M Vintzileos.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the genetic risk assessment of the referring obstetrician to the risk assessment of the genetic counselor. STUDY
DESIGN: All patients evaluated between January 1, 1999, and March 31, 1999, and who required genetic counseling were retrospectively reviewed. The genetic risk assessment of the referring obstetrician was compared to the genetic risk assessment following counseling by a genetic counselor who used a questionnaire and a three-generation pedigree. The number of patients with additional genetic risk factors identified by the genetic counselor were recorded and compared by using the McNemar chi-square test. Group demographics and characteristics were evaluated.
RESULTS: Among the 145 patients evaluated, 38% (n = 55) had additional genetic risk factors detected by the genetic counselor (P =.01). The maternal demographics and characteristics did not differ between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: The practice of referring high-risk obstetric patients for genetic counseling improves the detection of identifiable genetic risk factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11717627     DOI: 10.1067/mob.2001.117672

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  6 in total

1.  The current state of genetic counseling before and after amniocentesis for fetal karyotyping in Japan: a survey of obstetric hospital clients of a prenatal testing laboratory.

Authors:  Miyuki Nishiyama; Hideaki Sawai; Shinji Kosugi
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-08-24       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  How do obstetric providers discuss referrals for prenatal genetic counseling?

Authors:  Barbara A Bernhardt; Carrie Mastromarino Haunstetter; Debra Roter; Gail Geller
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Attitudes of health care trainees about genetics and disability: issues of access, health care communication, and decision making.

Authors:  Kelly E Ormond; Carol J Gill; Patrick Semik; Kristi L Kirschner
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  The clinical content of preconception care: genetics and genomics.

Authors:  Benjamin D Solomon; Brian W Jack; W Gregory Feero
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  A pilot study of a family history risk assessment tool for cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Heather M MacLeod; Elizabeth M McNally
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-09-13       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Validation of My Family Health Portrait for six common heritable conditions.

Authors:  Flavia M Facio; W Gregory Feero; Amy Linn; Neal Oden; Kandamurugu Manickam; Leslie G Biesecker
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 8.822

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.