Literature DB >> 11717066

Technology and archives in radiology research: a sampling analysis of articles published in the AJR and Radiology. American Journal of Roentgenology.

Y Ozsunar1, A Unsal, A Akdilli, C Karaman, T A Huisman, A G Sorensen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to determine the use of advanced technology and archiving and the contribution of countries other than United States in the articles published in the American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR) and Radiology. We analyzed the association of these features with the type of research, the main technical features of the modalities used, and the countries of origin.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We determined the proportion of articles published in 18 randomly selected issues of the AJR and Radiology that required advanced imaging techniques and relied on the analysis of archived data. "Advanced technology" was defined as imaging techniques that serve a purpose other than simple anatomic imaging or that are not widely available because of the high cost of the technology, such as functional imaging and computer programming designed for an individual study or simulation studies. We analyzed the association of these features with the country of origin, the topic, and the methodology used.
RESULTS: Sixteen percent of the studies required advanced technology. MR imaging, CT, and sonography were the most frequently used modalities (31%, 27%, and 15% of studies, respectively). Archiving was used in 37% of the studies, and 67% of the original articles were prospective. The articles most commonly originated in North America (67%), Europe (20%), and Asia (12%).
CONCLUSION: Only a small percentage of published research studies required advanced technology and approximately one third of the studies used archiving. These results may suggest that other criteria, such as the design of the study, its relevance for daily clinical use, and the originality of the paper, have a major impact on the acceptance of papers in clinically oriented radiology journals.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11717066     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.177.6.1771281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  6 in total

Review 1.  Clinical research and diagnostic efficacy studies in the oral and maxillofacial radiology literature: 1996-2005.

Authors:  I H Kim; M J Patel; S L Hirt; M L Kantor
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Funding resources for junior paediatric radiology clinical scientists: where should they look?

Authors:  Elspeth H Whitby
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-10-21

3.  Korea's contribution to radiological research included in Science Citation Index Expanded, 1986-2010.

Authors:  You Jin Ku; Dae Young Yoon; Kyoung Ja Lim; Sora Baek; Young Lan Seo; Eun Joo Yun; Chul Soon Choi; Sang Hoon Bae; Hyun Lee; Young-Su Ju
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 3.500

4.  Distribution of country of origin in studies used in Cochrane Reviews.

Authors:  Robert F Wolff; Stefan Reinders; Michael Barth; Gerd Antes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Characteristics and trends in publication of scientific papers presented at the European Congress of Radiology: a comparison between 2000 and 2010.

Authors:  Will Loughborough; Helen Dale; James H Wareham; Adam H Youssef; Mark A Rodrigues; Jonathan C L Rodrigues
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2016-08-02

6.  All nations depend on the global knowledge pool--analysis of country of origin of studies used for health technology assessments in Germany.

Authors:  Kirsten H Herrmann; Robert Wolff; Fueloep Scheibler; Siw Waffenschmidt; Lars G Hemkens; Stefan Sauerland; Gerd Antes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.