Literature DB >> 11716994

Effects of different types of hormone replacement therapy on mammographic density.

N Colacurci1, F Fornaro, P De Franciscis, M Palermo, W del Vecchio.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: to evaluate the effects of different types of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) on mammographic density in postmenopausal women.
METHODS: In a prospective 1-year study, 121 healthy postmenopausal women were allocated to one of the following five study groups: twenty-six women were treated with continuous transdermal 17beta-estradiol 50 mcg/die plus acetate nomegestrolo 5 mg/die sequentially added for 12 days per month (Group A); 25 women were treated with continuous transdermal 17beta-estradiol 50 mcg/die plus acetate nomegestrolo 2.5 mg/die added every day (Group B); 23 women were treated with continuous transdermal 17beta-estradiol 50 mcg/die (Group C); 24 women were treated with tibolone 2.5 mg/die (Group D); and 23 women not receiving any medication represented the control group (Group E). At the time of recruitment and after 12 months a two-view mammography was performed to evaluate mammographic density according to a quantitative method: type 1 (less than 25% of mammary gland covered by dense tissue), type 2 (from 25 to 75% of total glandular area covered by dense tissue), type 3 (more than 75% of mammary parenchyma covered by dense tissue).
RESULTS: After 12 months of HRT, seven out of 20 patients (35%) in group A, nine of 21 patients (42.85%) in group B, four out of 19 patients (21%) in group C and two of 20 patients (10%) in group D, showed an increase in mammographic density. No variation of density was observed at the second mammographic test in the control group. The mammographic density increase which occurred in groups A, B and C was statistically significant (P<0.05) when compared with group E; no statistically significant difference (P=0.49) was found in mammographic density increase between group D and group E. When the different treatment types were compared each other, a statistically significant difference (P=0.04) was found only between the mammographic density increase occurring in groups B and D.
CONCLUSIONS: HRT may cause an increase of mammographic density. The frequency of the density increase is related to the type of HRT and a replacement therapy including a progestin, especially in continuous combination with estrogen, leads to more evident mammographic changes. Tibolone does not significantly affect mammographic density.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11716994     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5122(01)00232-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Maturitas        ISSN: 0378-5122            Impact factor:   4.342


  10 in total

1.  Hormone replacement therapy after the menopause--where are we now?

Authors:  Janice Rymer; David W Sturdee
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 2.  Physical activity and mammographic breast density: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lusine Yaghjyan; Graham A Colditz; Kathleen Wolin
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 3.  Tibolone and breast cancer.

Authors:  C Tamer Erel; Levent M Senturk; Semih Kaleli
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.401

4.  Mammographic Density Change With Estrogen and Progestin Therapy and Breast Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Celia Byrne; Giske Ursin; Christopher F Martin; Jennifer D Peck; Elodia B Cole; Donglin Zeng; Eunhee Kim; Martin D Yaffe; Norman F Boyd; Gerardo Heiss; Anne McTiernan; Rowan T Chlebowski; Dorothy S Lane; JoAnn E Manson; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Etta D Pisano
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Relationship between breast cancer risk factors and mammographic breast density in the Fernald Community Cohort.

Authors:  L Yaghjyan; M C Mahoney; P Succop; R Wones; J Buckholz; S M Pinney
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Hormone replacement therapy and false positive recall in the Million Women Study: patterns of use, hormonal constituents and consistency of effect.

Authors:  Emily Banks; Gillian Reeves; Valerie Beral; Diana Bull; Barbara Crossley; Moya Simmonds; Elizabeth Hilton; Stephen Bailey; Nigel Barrett; Peter Briers; Ruth English; Alan Jackson; Elizabeth Kutt; Janet Lavelle; Linda Rockall; Matthew G Wallis; Mary Wilson; Julietta Patnick
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2005-12-23       Impact factor: 6.466

7.  Factors Associated with Mammographic Density in Postmenopausal Women.

Authors:  Emel Kiyak Caglayan; Kasim Caglayan; Ismet Alkis; Ergin Arslan; Aylin Okur; Oktay Banli; Yaprak Engin-Ustün
Journal:  J Menopausal Med       Date:  2015-08-28

8.  Ethnic differences in mammographic densities: an Asian cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Shivaani Mariapun; Jingmei Li; Cheng Har Yip; Nur Aishah Mohd Taib; Soo-Hwang Teo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  MRI background parenchymal enhancement, breast density and serum hormones in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Jennifer D Brooks; Janice S Sung; Malcolm C Pike; Irene Orlow; Frank Z Stanczyk; Jonine L Bernstein; Elizabeth A Morris
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2018-03-25       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 10.  Postmenopausal hormone therapy and breast cancer: a clinician's message for patients.

Authors:  Leon Speroff
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.925

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.