Literature DB >> 11716419

Comparative strength of three methods of fixation of transverse acetabular fractures.

J K Chang1, S S Gill, R D Zura, W R Krause, G J Wang.   

Abstract

With the advent of percutaneously placed lag screws for fixation of acetabular fractures, this study evaluated the strength of lag screw fixation compared with traditional fixation techniques of transverse acetabular fractures. Ten formalin-treated human, cadaveric pelvic specimens with bilateral, transtectal transverse acetabular fractures were used for this study. The right acetabular fractures were fixed with a five-hole plate and four screws with the central hole spanning the posterior fracture site. The left acetabular fractures were fixed with two lag screws, one each in the anterior and posterior columns, or with a screw and wire construct stabilizing both columns. The specimens were loaded to implant failure. Stiffness, yield strength, maximum load at failure, and site of failure was recorded. The plate and screw construct showed significantly greater yield and maximum strength when compared with the two lag screws. The stiffness of the lag screw method was 39% higher than that of the plating method, but this result was not statistically significant. In addition, the plate and screw method provided significantly greater maximum strength than the screw and wire technique. The quadrilateral plate seemed to be the weakest area of fixation because 83% of the implant failures occurred in this region. In patients in whom the risks of formal open reduction and internal fixation of acetabular fractures outweigh the possible benefits, such as in patients with burns or degloved skin, the advent of computer-assisted and fluoroscopically guided percutaneous surgical techniques have been instrumental. This study showed there is greater strength of fixation with a plate and screw construct, possibly secondary to supplementary fixation distal to the quadrilateral plate. However, lag screw fixation provided relatively greater stiffness, which may account for its clinical success. Percutaneous lag screw fixation of appropriate transverse acetabular fractures is a viable option.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11716419     DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200111000-00057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  18 in total

1.  A novel navigation template for fixation of acetabular posterior column fractures with antegrade lag screws: design and application.

Authors:  Hongfen Chen; Gang Wang; Runguang Li; Yongjian Sun; Fuming Wang; Hui Zhao; Peijun Zhang; Xuanxuan Zhang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Axial perspective to find the largest intraosseous space available for percutaneous screw fixation of fractures of the acetabular anterior column.

Authors:  XiaoReng Feng; JinTao Fang; Chaowen Lin; Sheng Zhang; WenXiong Lei; YuanHui Li; SanYuan Tang; Bin Chen
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Screw placement in percutaneous acetabular surgery: gender differences of anatomical landmarks in a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Thomas Dienstknecht; Michael Müller; Richard Sellei; Michael Nerlich; Franz Josef Müller; Bernd Fuechtmeier; Arne Berner
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Sex-specific differences of the infraacetabular corridor: a biomorphometric CT-based analysis on a database of 523 pelves.

Authors:  Florian Gras; Heiko Gottschling; Manuel Schröder; Ivan Marintschev; Nils Reimers; Rainer Burgkart
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-09-27       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Single column locking plate fixation is inadequate in two column acetabular fractures. A biomechanical analysis.

Authors:  Kiarash Khajavi; Arthur T Lee; Derek P Lindsey; Philipp Leucht; Michael J Bellino; Nicholas J Giori
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2010-05-09       Impact factor: 2.359

6.  Are quadrilateral surface buttress plates comparable to traditional forms of transverse acetabular fracture fixation?

Authors:  Brian J Kistler; Ian R Smithson; Seth A Cooper; Jacob L Cox; Aniruddh N Nayak; Brandon G Santoni; H Claude Sagi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  A biomechanical study of conventional acetabular internal fracture fixation versus locking plate fixation.

Authors:  Ramin Mehin; Bryn Jones; Qingan Zhu; Henry Broekhuyse
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.089

8.  Biomechanical comparison of different stabilization constructs for unstable posterior wall fractures of acetabulum. A cadaveric study.

Authors:  Yuntong Zhang; Yang Tang; Panfeng Wang; Xue Zhao; Shuogui Xu; Chuncai Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Operative treatment of transverse acetabular fractures: is it really necessary to fix both columns?

Authors:  Vincenzo Giordano; Ney Pecegueiro do Amaral; Alexandre Pallottino; Rodrigo Pires e Albuquerque; Carlos Eduardo Franklin; Pedro José Labronici
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2009-07-12       Impact factor: 3.738

10.  Posterior column acetabular fracture fixation using a W-shaped angular plate: A biomechanical analysis.

Authors:  Ke Su; Song Liu; Tao Wu; Yingchao Yin; Ruipeng Zhang; Shilun Li; Yingze Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.