SETTING: The role of the private sector in tuberculosis treatment in developing countries in sub-Saharan Africa is largely unknown. In recent years, many fee-for-service clinics have opened up in Kampala, Uganda. Little is known about the tuberculosis caseload seen in private clinics or the standard of care provided to the patients. OBJECTIVE: To compare the appropriateness of tuberculosis care in private and public clinics, and the extent of the tuberculosis burden handled in the private sector. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey in private and public clinics treating tuberculosis patients in Kampala, Uganda, during June to August 1999. MEASUREMENTS: Clinics were evaluated for appropriateness of care. This was defined as provision of proper diagnosis (sputum smear microscopy as the primary means of diagnosis), treatment (short-course chemotherapy, with or without directly observed therapy), outcome evaluation (smear microscopy at 6 or 7 months) and case notification in accordance with the Uganda National Tuberculosis and Leprosy Programme. RESULTS: A total of 114 clinics (104 private, 10 public) were surveyed. Forty-one per cent of the private clinics saw three or more new tuberculosis patients each month. None of the public or private clinics met all standards for appropriate tuberculosis care. Only 24% of all clinics adhered to WHO-recommended treatment guidelines. Public clinics, younger practitioners and practitioners with advanced degrees were most likely to provide appropriate care for tuberculosis. CONCLUSION: The private sector cares for many tuberculosis cases in Kampala; however, a new programme that offers continuing medical education is needed to improve tuberculosis care and to increase awareness of national guidelines for tuberculosis care.
SETTING: The role of the private sector in tuberculosis treatment in developing countries in sub-Saharan Africa is largely unknown. In recent years, many fee-for-service clinics have opened up in Kampala, Uganda. Little is known about the tuberculosis caseload seen in private clinics or the standard of care provided to the patients. OBJECTIVE: To compare the appropriateness of tuberculosis care in private and public clinics, and the extent of the tuberculosis burden handled in the private sector. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey in private and public clinics treating tuberculosispatients in Kampala, Uganda, during June to August 1999. MEASUREMENTS: Clinics were evaluated for appropriateness of care. This was defined as provision of proper diagnosis (sputum smear microscopy as the primary means of diagnosis), treatment (short-course chemotherapy, with or without directly observed therapy), outcome evaluation (smear microscopy at 6 or 7 months) and case notification in accordance with the Uganda National Tuberculosis and Leprosy Programme. RESULTS: A total of 114 clinics (104 private, 10 public) were surveyed. Forty-one per cent of the private clinics saw three or more new tuberculosispatients each month. None of the public or private clinics met all standards for appropriate tuberculosis care. Only 24% of all clinics adhered to WHO-recommended treatment guidelines. Public clinics, younger practitioners and practitioners with advanced degrees were most likely to provide appropriate care for tuberculosis. CONCLUSION: The private sector cares for many tuberculosis cases in Kampala; however, a new programme that offers continuing medical education is needed to improve tuberculosis care and to increase awareness of national guidelines for tuberculosis care.
Authors: Juliet N Sekandi; Sarah Zalwango; Leonardo Martinez; Andreas Handel; Robert Kakaire; Allan K Nkwata; Amara E Ezeamama; Noah Kiwanuka; Christopher C Whalen Journal: BMC Infect Dis Date: 2015-08-21 Impact factor: 3.090
Authors: Steven J Hoffman; G Emmanuel Guindon; John N Lavis; Harkanwal Randhawa; Francisco Becerra-Posada; Masoumeh Dejman; Katayoun Falahat; Hossein Malek-Afzali; Parasurama Ramachandran; Guang Shi; C A K Yesudian Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2016-02-22 Impact factor: 2.345