Literature DB >> 11714413

Debate: Are surrogate end-point studies worth the effort?

Jonathan Valabhji1, Robert S Elkeles.   

Abstract

Surrogate end-points of cardiovascular disease can provide useful information in cross-sectional, prospective and interventional studies. They provide information on association with risk factors, natural history and factors associated with disease progression. Because every participant can reach an end-point, sufficient power can be attained with much smaller numbers of subjects in surrogate end-point studies than in studies that use clinical endpoints, so that the costs are likely to be substantially less. Measures of carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) by B-mode ultrasonography and of coronary calcification by electron beam computed tomography (EBCT) appear to be the most promising surrogate end-points.

Entities:  

Year:  2000        PMID: 11714413      PMCID: PMC59602          DOI: 10.1186/cvm-1-2-072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med        ISSN: 1468-6694


  26 in total

1.  Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography.

Authors:  A S Agatston; W R Janowitz; F J Hildner; N R Zusmer; M Viamonte; R Detrano
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1990-03-15       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Carotid-artery intima and media thickness as a risk factor for myocardial infarction and stroke in older adults. Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group.

Authors:  D H O'Leary; J F Polak; R A Kronmal; T A Manolio; G L Burke; S K Wolfson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-01-07       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  The predictive value of resting electrocardiograms for 12-year incidence of coronary heart disease in the Honolulu Heart Program.

Authors:  R Knutsen; S F Knutsen; J D Curb; D M Reed; J A Kautz; K Yano
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes. A double-blind placebo-controlled study of bezafibrate: the St. Mary's, Ealing, Northwick Park Diabetes Cardiovascular Disease Prevention (SENDCAP) Study.

Authors:  R S Elkeles; J R Diamond; C Poulter; S Dhanjil; A N Nicolaides; S Mahmood; W Richmond; H Mather; P Sharp; M D Feher
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 5.  Carotid artery intima-media thickness as an indicator of generalized atherosclerosis.

Authors:  D E Grobbee; M L Bots
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 8.989

6.  Predictive value of electron beam computed tomography of the coronary arteries. 19-month follow-up of 1173 asymptomatic subjects.

Authors:  Y Arad; L A Spadaro; K Goodman; A Lledo-Perez; S Sherman; G Lerner; A D Guerci
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1996-06-01       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Non-invasive detection of endothelial dysfunction in children and adults at risk of atherosclerosis.

Authors:  D S Celermajer; K E Sorensen; V M Gooch; D J Spiegelhalter; O I Miller; I D Sullivan; J K Lloyd; J E Deanfield
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-11-07       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  The Bedford survey: ten year mortality rates in newly diagnosed diabetics, borderline diabetics and normoglycaemic controls and risk indices for coronary heart disease in borderline diabetics.

Authors:  R J Jarrett; P McCartney; H Keen
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 10.122

9.  Correlation of ultrasound-measured common carotid artery stiffness with pathological findings.

Authors:  T Wada; K Kodaira; K Fujishiro; K Maie; E Tsukiyama; T Fukumoto; T Uchida; S Yamazaki
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb       Date:  1994-03

10.  Prognostic value of coronary calcification and angiographic stenoses in patients undergoing coronary angiography.

Authors:  R Detrano; T Hsiai; S Wang; G Puentes; J Fallavollita; P Shields; W Stanford; C Wolfkiel; D Georgiou; M Budoff; J Reed
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 24.094

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.