Literature DB >> 11713872

What causes the isolation effect?

R R Hunt1, C A Lamb.   

Abstract

Events that are incongruent with their prevailing context are usually very well remembered. This fact often is described as the distinctiveness effect in memory, an effect that has served as explanation not only of memory phenomena but also of various other phenomena, including social judgment. The core laboratory paradigm for studying distinctiveness in memory research has long been the isolation paradigm. This paradigm, sometimes attributed to H. von Restorff, yields better memory for an item categorically isolated from surrounding items than for the surrounding items and a proper control item. The authors offer an interpretation of the isolation effect based on the analysis of the processing of similarities and differences among the items. Two experiments provide evidence for this interpretation. The results are discussed in the context of current theories of distinctiveness effects in memory. An appeal is made for a different conceptualization of distinctiveness effects, one that treats distinctiveness as a discriminative process in memory that requires processing of both similarities and differences among items.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11713872

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  32 in total

1.  Novelty effects on recollection and familiarity in recognition memory.

Authors:  Mark M Kishiyama; Andrew P Yonelinas
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-10

2.  Autobiographical memories for the September 11th attacks: reconstructive errors and emotional impairment of memory.

Authors:  Stephen R Schmidt
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-04

3.  Disentangling encoding versus retrieval explanations of the bizarreness effect: implications for distinctiveness.

Authors:  Mark A McDaniel; Courtney C Dornburg; Melissa J Guynn
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-03

4.  Emotion enhances remembrance of neutral events past.

Authors:  Adam K Anderson; Peter E Wais; John D E Gabrieli
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-01-24       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The role of recollection and familiarity in the context variability mirror effect.

Authors:  Gabriel I Cook; Richard L Marsh; Jason L Hicks
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-03

6.  Impoverished cue support enhances subsequent retention: support for the elaborative retrieval explanation of the testing effect.

Authors:  Shana K Carpenter; Edward L DeLosh
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-03

7.  Vancouver, Toronto, Montreal, Austin: enhanced oddball memory through differentiation, not isolation.

Authors:  Yasuaki Sakamoto; Bradley C Love
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-06

8.  A contextual interference account of distinctiveness effects in recognition.

Authors:  Heekyeong Park; Jason Arndt; Lynne M Reder
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-06

9.  Infants' Visual Recognition Memory for a Series of Categorically Related Items.

Authors:  Lisa M Oakes; Kristine A Kovack-Lesh
Journal:  J Cogn Dev       Date:  2012-03-07

10.  The Attentional Boost Effect: Transient increases in attention to one task enhance performance in a second task.

Authors:  Khena M Swallow; Yuhong V Jiang
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-01-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.