Literature DB >> 11712611

Comparison of self-assessment and expert assessment of occupational exposure to chemicals.

I E Liljelind1, S M Rappaport, J O Levin, A E Strömback, A L Sunesson, B G Järvholm.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Occupational assessments of chemical exposure are often inadequate because of difficulties in obtaining sufficient numbers of measurements by trained professionals (experts). The objective of this study was to determine whether workers can provide unbiased data via self-assessments of exposure facilitated by the use of simple passive monitors for personal sampling.
METHODS: Untrained workers obtained personal measurements of their exposures to gaseous contaminants (terpenes in sawmills and styrene in reinforced plastics factories) with passive monitors and written instructions. To study the validity of the self-assessments, an occupational hygienist performed exposure measurements on the same occupational groups after the workers had obtained two or more measurements independently. The potential bias of the self-assessments was evaluated by comparing the self-assessments with the expert assessments in mixed-effects statistical models.
RESULTS: A total of 153 terpene (97 self and 56 expert) and 216 styrene (159 self and 57 expert) measurements were obtained from four sawmills and six reinforced plastics factories, respectively. No significant differences in the geometric mean exposures were observed between the self-assessments and the expert assessments in 3 of 4 sawmills and 5 of 6 reinforced plastics factories (P > 0.10). The potential bias of the self-assessments of exposure ranged from less than 0.1% to 102% and was less than 17% in 9 of the 10 groups investigated.
CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that untrained, unsupervised workers are able to collect consistently unbiased exposure data by employing currently available passive monitors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11712611     DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.619

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health        ISSN: 0355-3140            Impact factor:   5.024


  4 in total

1.  Design of measurement strategies for workplace exposures.

Authors:  Hans Kromhout
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Exposure assessment of monoterpenes and styrene: a comparison of air sampling and biomonitoring.

Authors:  I Liljelind; S Rappaport; K Eriksson; J Andersson; I A Bergdahl; A-L Sunesson; B Järvholm
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  Exposure to Wood Dust, Microbial Components, and Terpenes in the Norwegian Sawmill Industry.

Authors:  Anne Straumfors; Raymond Olsen; Hanne Line Daae; Anani Afanou; Dave McLean; Marine Corbin; Andrea 't Mannetje; Bente Ulvestad; Berit Bakke; Helle Laier Johnsen; Jeroen Douwes; Wijnand Eduard
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 2.179

4.  Relative performance of different exposure modeling approaches for sulfur dioxide concentrations in the air in rural western Canada.

Authors:  Igor Burstyn; Nicola M Cherry; Yutaka Yasui; Hyang-Mi Kim
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2008-07-04       Impact factor: 4.615

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.