Literature DB >> 11712588

Estimating the contributions of mobile sources of PAH to urban air using real-time PAH monitoring.

J C Dunbar1, C I Lin, I Vergucht, J Wong, J L Duran.   

Abstract

Motor vehicles are a significant source of airborne polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) in many urban areas. Traditional approaches used in determining the relative contributions of individual vehicle types to the total amount of PAH in air have been based on the analysis of integrated samples of airborne particles and gases for the presence of chemical tracers indicative of the vehicles from which the chemicals derived. As an alternative, we have used a photoelectric aerosol sensor (PAS) capable of measuring PAH levels in real-time in the emissions plumes from motor vehicles. We placed the PAS near a traffic-light in Kenmore Square, a busy crossroads in downtown Boston (MA, USA). A video camera co-located at the site recorded the vehicles passing the sensor, and this record was correlated with the PAS data. During a 5-day monitoring period (approximately 59 h) in the summer of 1998, over 34,000 motor vehicles were counted and classified and over 24,000 PAS readings were recorded (frequency = 1/8.6 s). The composition of the vehicle population was 94% passenger vehicles, 1.4% buses, 2.6% small trucks, 1.3% medium trucks, 0.35% large trucks, and 0.45% garbage and construction trucks. In analyzing the PAS data, it was assumed that the highest PAS measurements--those that exceeded the 95% critical level of the 5-min moving average of all the PAS measurements--were indicative of primary vehicular emissions. We found that approximately 46% of the mass of particle-bound PAH (i.e. approximately 46% of the integrated area under the PAS signal vs. time plots) was attributable to primary emissions from motor vehicles passing the sensor. Of this, 35-61% was attributable to passenger vehicles (cars, pickup trucks, and sports utility vehicles) and 39-65% was attributable to non-passenger vehicles [buses (14-23%), small trucks (12-20%), medium trucks (8.4-14%), large trucks (2.9-4.8%) and garbage and construction trucks (1.9-3.2%)]. Our results suggest that on a per vehicle basis, buses and trucks--the majority of which run on diesel fuel--emitted greater amounts of particle-bound PAH than passenger vehicles. Overall, we found that real-time photoelectric aerosol sensing (in combination with video photography) is useful for estimating the contributions of airborne PAB from different vehicle types. Due to the physical constraints of our monitoring site and the high volumes of traffic, however, it was not possible to uniquely attribute PAS signals to individual vehicles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11712588     DOI: 10.1016/s0048-9697(01)00686-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  10 in total

1.  Exposure to multiple sources of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and breast cancer incidence.

Authors:  Alexandra J White; Patrick T Bradshaw; Amy H Herring; Susan L Teitelbaum; Jan Beyea; Steven D Stellman; Susan E Steck; Irina Mordukhovich; Sybil M Eng; Lawrence S Engel; Kathleen Conway; Maureen Hatch; Alfred I Neugut; Regina M Santella; Marilie D Gammon
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2016-02-13       Impact factor: 9.621

2.  Effect of water current on the distribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, heavy metals and benthic diatom community in sediments of Haihe estuary, China.

Authors:  Jinxia Yan; Jingling Liu; Yi Li; Sisi Lang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Cost of developmental delay from prenatal exposure to airborne polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.

Authors:  Katherine Weiland; Matthew Neidell; Virginia Rauh; Frederica Perera
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2011-02

4.  On-Roadway In-Cabin Exposure to Particulate Matter: Measurement Results Using Both Continuous and Time-Integrated Sampling Approaches.

Authors:  Roby Greenwald; Michael H Bergin; Fuyuen Yip; Tegan Boehmer; Priya Kewada; Martin M Shafer; James J Schauer; Jeremy A Sarnat
Journal:  Aerosol Sci Technol       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 4.809

5.  Spatial and temporal trends of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and other traffic-related airborne pollutants in New York City.

Authors:  Rafael F Narváez; Lori Hoepner; Steven N Chillrud; Beizhan Yan; Robin Garfinkel; Robin Whyatt; David Camann; Frederica P Perera; Patrick L Kinney; Rachel L Miller
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Spatial and temporal variations and mobile source emissions of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in Quito, Ecuador.

Authors:  Megan V Brachtl; John L Durant; Carlos Paez Perez; Jorge Oviedo; Fernando Sempertegui; Elena N Naumova; Jeffrey K Griffiths
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2008-11-11       Impact factor: 8.071

7.  Urinary metabolites of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in pregnant women and their association with a biomarker of oxidative stress.

Authors:  Xiang-Yin Lou; Peng-Ran Wu; Ying Guo
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-07-19       Impact factor: 5.190

8.  Prenatal polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon, adiposity, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) γ methylation in offspring, grand-offspring mice.

Authors:  Zhonghai Yan; Hanjie Zhang; Christina Maher; Emilio Arteaga-Solis; Frances A Champagne; Licheng Wu; Jacob D McDonald; Beizhan Yan; Gary J Schwartz; Rachel L Miller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Predictors of personal polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon exposures among pregnant minority women in New York City.

Authors:  Cathryn C Tonne; Robin M Whyatt; David E Camann; Frederica P Perera; Patrick L Kinney
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Imputation method for lifetime exposure assessment in air pollution epidemiologic studies.

Authors:  Jan Beyea; Steven D Stellman; Susan Teitelbaum; Irina Mordukhovich; Marilie D Gammon
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 5.984

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.