BACKGROUND: Insulin-like growth factors (IGF) I and II improve myocardial function after coronary occlusion in different animal models. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the mechanism of improved myocardial function after administration of IGF-I or IGF-II in acute myocardial infarction. METHODS: Female pigs (mean (SD) weight 25 (5) kg) were subjected to acute myocardial infarction by microembolisation with 75-150 micrometer affigel blue beads. The beads contained and slowly released 150 microgram/pig of IGF-I (n = 6), IGF-II (n = 6), or pig albumin (n = 6). Echocardiography, perfusion imaging, and haemodynamic measurements were performed before infarction and during four weeks after infarction. Regional wall motion of different left ventricular segments was scored semiquantitatively on the basis of a three point scoring system, from normal = 0 to dyskinesia = 3. Serum cardiac troponin I concentration was measured before, immediately after, and three hours after the infarct. Excised hearts were analysed for actin, desmin, blood vessel density, and DNA laddering within the infarct, border, and normal myocardial areas. RESULTS: Myocardial function of the infarct related area improved significantly during the four weeks of follow up in both the IGF groups (p = 0.01). Myocardial perfusion, heart rate, and blood pressure were similar in all the animals during the study. Treated animals had lower serum cardiac troponin I concentration (p = 0.001), more actin in the border area (p = 0.01) and infarct area (p = 0.0001), and reduced DNA laddering in the infarct area compared with the controls (p < 0.05). IGF groups had more blood vessels in the border area (p = 0.04) and the infarct area (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Both types of IGF improved myocardial function and the improvement was associated with preservation of myocardial structure. IGF-I was more effective than IGF-II.
BACKGROUND:Insulin-like growth factors (IGF) I and II improve myocardial function after coronary occlusion in different animal models. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the mechanism of improved myocardial function after administration of IGF-I or IGF-II in acute myocardial infarction. METHODS: Female pigs (mean (SD) weight 25 (5) kg) were subjected to acute myocardial infarction by microembolisation with 75-150 micrometer affigel blue beads. The beads contained and slowly released 150 microgram/pig of IGF-I (n = 6), IGF-II (n = 6), or pig albumin (n = 6). Echocardiography, perfusion imaging, and haemodynamic measurements were performed before infarction and during four weeks after infarction. Regional wall motion of different left ventricular segments was scored semiquantitatively on the basis of a three point scoring system, from normal = 0 to dyskinesia = 3. Serum cardiac troponin I concentration was measured before, immediately after, and three hours after the infarct. Excised hearts were analysed for actin, desmin, blood vessel density, and DNA laddering within the infarct, border, and normal myocardial areas. RESULTS: Myocardial function of the infarct related area improved significantly during the four weeks of follow up in both the IGF groups (p = 0.01). Myocardial perfusion, heart rate, and blood pressure were similar in all the animals during the study. Treated animals had lower serum cardiac troponin I concentration (p = 0.001), more actin in the border area (p = 0.01) and infarct area (p = 0.0001), and reduced DNA laddering in the infarct area compared with the controls (p < 0.05). IGF groups had more blood vessels in the border area (p = 0.04) and the infarct area (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Both types of IGF improved myocardial function and the improvement was associated with preservation of myocardial structure. IGF-I was more effective than IGF-II.
Authors: N B Schiller; P M Shah; M Crawford; A DeMaria; R Devereux; H Feigenbaum; H Gutgesell; N Reichek; D Sahn; I Schnittger Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 1989 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Sally L Ricketts; Katrijn L Rensing; Jeff M Holly; Li Chen; Elizabeth H Young; Robert Luben; Sofie Ashford; Kijoung Song; Xin Yuan; Abbas Dehghan; Benjamin J Wright; Dawn M Waterworth; Vincent Mooser; Gérard Waeber; Peter Vollenweider; Stephen E Epstein; Mary S Burnett; Joseph M Devaney; Hakon H Hakonarson; Daniel J Rader; Muredach P Reilly; John Danesh; Simon G Thompson; Alison M Dunning; Cornelia M van Duijn; Nilesh J Samani; Ruth McPherson; Nicholas J Wareham; Kay-Tee Khaw; S Matthijs Boekholdt; Manjinder S Sandhu Journal: Int J Mol Epidemiol Genet Date: 2011-08-03
Authors: Andre Heinen; Rianne Nederlof; Priyadarshini Panjwani; André Spychala; Tengis Tschaidse; Heiko Reffelt; Johannes Boy; Annika Raupach; Stefanie Gödecke; Patrick Petzsch; Karl Köhrer; Maria Grandoch; Anne Petz; Jens W Fischer; Christina Alter; Jelena Vasilevska; Philipp Lang; Axel Gödecke Journal: Mol Ther Date: 2018-11-01 Impact factor: 11.454
Authors: Yi Sui; Wei Zhang; Tao Tang; Lili Gao; Ting Cao; Hongbo Zhu; Qinghua You; Bo Yu; Tao Yang Journal: Stem Cell Res Ther Date: 2020-02-26 Impact factor: 6.832
Authors: Barbara De Angelis; Fabrizio Orlandi; Margarida Fernandes Lopes Morais D'Autilio; Maria G Scioli; Augusto Orlandi; Valerio Cervelli; Pietro Gentile Journal: Int Wound J Date: 2018-03-28 Impact factor: 3.315
Authors: Rianne Nederlof; Sophia Reidel; André Spychala; Stefanie Gödecke; André Heinen; Tobias Lautwein; Patrick Petzsch; Karl Köhrer; Axel Gödecke Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2022-07-15 Impact factor: 8.786