BACKGROUND: Linkage data have now identified several inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) susceptibility loci but these data have not been consistently replicated in independent studies. One potential explanation for this is the possibility that patients enrolled in such studies may have been erroneously classified with respect to their diagnosis. AIMS: To determine the rate and type of misclassification in a large population of individuals referred for participation in an IBD genetics study and to examine the effect of diagnostic misclassification on the power to detect linkage. METHODS: The medical records of 1096 patients entered into an IBD genetics programme were reviewed using standardised diagnostic criteria. The original patient reported diagnoses were changed, if necessary, based on review, and the reasons for the change in diagnosis were recorded. To evaluate the effect of misclassification on linkage results, simulations were created with Gensim and analysed using Genehunter to evaluate a model for IBD inheritance. RESULTS: Sixty eight of 1096 (6.2%) individuals had a change in diagnosis from that originally reported. The majority of changes were patients with either Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis who were determined not to have IBD at all. The principal reasons for changes to the original diagnosis were discordance between the patients' subjective reports of diagnosis and actual clinical history, endoscopic, or pathological results; a change in disease pattern over time; and insufficient information available to confirm the original diagnosis. A 10% misclassification rate resulted in 28.4% and 40.2% loss of power to detect a true linkage when using a statistical model for a presumed IBD locus with lambda(s) values of 1.8 and 1.3, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic misclassification occurs in patients enrolled in IBD genetic studies and frequently involves assigning the diagnosis of IBD to non-affected individuals. Even low rates of diagnostic misclassification can lead to significant loss of power to detect a true linkage, particularly for loci with modest effects as are likely to be found in IBD.
BACKGROUND: Linkage data have now identified several inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) susceptibility loci but these data have not been consistently replicated in independent studies. One potential explanation for this is the possibility that patients enrolled in such studies may have been erroneously classified with respect to their diagnosis. AIMS: To determine the rate and type of misclassification in a large population of individuals referred for participation in an IBD genetics study and to examine the effect of diagnostic misclassification on the power to detect linkage. METHODS: The medical records of 1096 patients entered into an IBD genetics programme were reviewed using standardised diagnostic criteria. The original patient reported diagnoses were changed, if necessary, based on review, and the reasons for the change in diagnosis were recorded. To evaluate the effect of misclassification on linkage results, simulations were created with Gensim and analysed using Genehunter to evaluate a model for IBD inheritance. RESULTS: Sixty eight of 1096 (6.2%) individuals had a change in diagnosis from that originally reported. The majority of changes were patients with either Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis who were determined not to have IBD at all. The principal reasons for changes to the original diagnosis were discordance between the patients' subjective reports of diagnosis and actual clinical history, endoscopic, or pathological results; a change in disease pattern over time; and insufficient information available to confirm the original diagnosis. A 10% misclassification rate resulted in 28.4% and 40.2% loss of power to detect a true linkage when using a statistical model for a presumed IBD locus with lambda(s) values of 1.8 and 1.3, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic misclassification occurs in patients enrolled in IBD genetic studies and frequently involves assigning the diagnosis of IBD to non-affected individuals. Even low rates of diagnostic misclassification can lead to significant loss of power to detect a true linkage, particularly for loci with modest effects as are likely to be found in IBD.
Authors: J D Rioux; M S Silverberg; M J Daly; A H Steinhart; R S McLeod; A M Griffiths; T Green; T S Brettin; V Stone; S B Bull; A Bitton; C N Williams; G R Greenberg; Z Cohen; E S Lander; T J Hudson; K A Siminovitch Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2000-04-21 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Y Ma; J D Ohmen; Z Li; L G Bentley; C McElree; S Pressman; S R Targan; N Fischel-Ghodsian; J I Rotter; H Yang Journal: Inflamm Bowel Dis Date: 1999-11 Impact factor: 5.325
Authors: G Meucci; A Bortoli; F A Riccioli; C M Girelli; F Radaelli; R Rivolta; M Tatarella Journal: Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 1999-08 Impact factor: 2.566
Authors: N Le Berre; D Heresbach; M Kerbaol; S Caulet; J F Bretagne; J Chaperon; M Gosselin; M P Ramée Journal: J Clin Pathol Date: 1995-08 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Ethan M Lange; Lindsey A Ho; Jennifer L Beebe-Dimmer; Yunfei Wang; Elizabeth M Gillanders; Jeffrey M Trent; Leslie A Lange; David P Wood; Kathleen A Cooney Journal: Hum Genet Date: 2006-03-01 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: Manuel Alvarez-Lobos; Juan I Arostegui; Miquel Sans; Dolors Tassies; Susana Plaza; Salvadora Delgado; Antonio M Lacy; Josep M Pique; Jordi Yagüe; Julián Panés Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Andre Bleich; Michael Mähler; Claudia Most; Edward H Leiter; Elisabeth Liebler-Tenorio; Charles O Elson; Hans J Hedrich; Brigitte Schlegelberger; John P Sundberg Journal: Mamm Genome Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 2.957
Authors: W Miehsler; W Reinisch; E Valic; W Osterode; W Tillinger; T Feichtenschlager; J Grisar; K Machold; S Scholz; H Vogelsang; G Novacek Journal: Gut Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Rian M Nijmeijer; Raffaella M Gadaleta; Saskia W C van Mil; Adriaan A van Bodegraven; J Bart A Crusius; Gerard Dijkstra; Daan W Hommes; Dirk J de Jong; Pieter C F Stokkers; Hein W Verspaget; Rinse K Weersma; C Janneke van der Woude; Janneke M Stapelbroek; Marguerite E I Schipper; Cisca Wijmenga; Karel J van Erpecum; Bas Oldenburg Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-08-22 Impact factor: 3.240