BACKGROUND: Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is an important cause of neurodegenerative dementia, particularly in younger patients. TAU has been identified as the gene responsible for FTD linked to chromosome 17, but it is likely that there is pathological and genetic heterogeneity among families with FTD. OBJECTIVE: To explore the genetic and pathological basis of familial FTD. DESIGN: Clinical case series with genetic analysis of each family, and pathological confirmation of diagnosis where possible. SETTING: Specialist dementia research group, particularly recruiting patients with young-onset dementia. PATIENTS: Twenty-two families with an index member with FTD, meeting Lund-Manchester criteria, and a family history of other affected members with dementia were ascertained. RESULTS: Half of the families had mutations in the TAU gene (TAU exon 10 +14, +16, and P301S), and pathological diagnoses were available in 17 of 22 families. Three main pathological diagnoses were made: FTD with neuronal and glial tau deposition, FTD with ubiquitin inclusions, and FTD with neuronal loss and spongiosis but without intracellular inclusions. No cases of familial Pick disease were identified. With the use of the pathological diagnoses, each family with FTD with neuronal and glial tau deposition had a TAU mutation, whereas TAU mutations were not identified in families in the other 2 diagnostic groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study illustrates the value of TAU sequencing in FTD and suggests that around one half of individuals with familial FTD have TAU mutations and dementia with tau pathological findings. Furthermore, these data suggest that there are at least 2 additional genes to be identified among families with autosomal dominant FTD.
BACKGROUND: Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is an important cause of neurodegenerative dementia, particularly in younger patients. TAU has been identified as the gene responsible for FTD linked to chromosome 17, but it is likely that there is pathological and genetic heterogeneity among families with FTD. OBJECTIVE: To explore the genetic and pathological basis of familial FTD. DESIGN: Clinical case series with genetic analysis of each family, and pathological confirmation of diagnosis where possible. SETTING: Specialist dementia research group, particularly recruiting patients with young-onset dementia. PATIENTS: Twenty-two families with an index member with FTD, meeting Lund-Manchester criteria, and a family history of other affected members with dementia were ascertained. RESULTS: Half of the families had mutations in the TAU gene (TAU exon 10 +14, +16, and P301S), and pathological diagnoses were available in 17 of 22 families. Three main pathological diagnoses were made: FTD with neuronal and glial tau deposition, FTD with ubiquitin inclusions, and FTD with neuronal loss and spongiosis but without intracellular inclusions. No cases of familial Pick disease were identified. With the use of the pathological diagnoses, each family with FTD with neuronal and glial tau deposition had a TAU mutation, whereas TAU mutations were not identified in families in the other 2 diagnostic groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study illustrates the value of TAU sequencing in FTD and suggests that around one half of individuals with familial FTD have TAU mutations and dementia with tau pathological findings. Furthermore, these data suggest that there are at least 2 additional genes to be identified among families with autosomal dominant FTD.
Authors: Rosa Capozzo; Celeste Sassi; Monia B Hammer; Simona Arcuti; Chiara Zecca; Maria R Barulli; Rosanna Tortelli; J Raphael Gibbs; Cynthia Crews; Davide Seripa; Francesco Carnicella; Claudia Dell'Aquila; Marco Rossi; Filippo Tamma; Francesco Valluzzi; Bruno Brancasi; Francesco Panza; Andrew B Singleton; Giancarlo Logroscino Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2017-03-03 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Albert Lladó; Raquel Sánchez-Valle; Maria Jesús Rey; Mario Ezquerra; Eduardo Tolosa; Isidro Ferrer; José Luis Molinuevo Journal: J Neurol Date: 2008-03-25 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Prudence M Stanford; William S Brooks; Erdahl T Teber; Marianne Hallupp; Catriona McLean; Glenda M Halliday; Ralph N Martins; John B J Kwok; Peter R Schofield Journal: J Neurol Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Anna-Lotta Kaivorinne; Johanna Krüger; Katja Kuivaniemi; Hannu Tuominen; Virpi Moilanen; Kari Majamaa; Anne M Remes Journal: BMC Neurol Date: 2008-12-17 Impact factor: 2.474