Literature DB >> 11707584

Low amplification and fast visual pigment phosphorylation as mechanisms characterizing cone photoresponses.

S Tachibanaki1, S Tsushima, S Kawamura.   

Abstract

Vertebrate cone photoreceptors are known to show lower light sensitivity and briefer photoresponses than rod photoreceptors. To understand the molecular mechanisms characterizing cone photoresponses, we compared some of the reactions in the phototransduction cascade between rods and cones. For this purpose, rods and cones were obtained in quantities large enough to do biochemical studies. The cells were purified from the retina of carp (Cyprinus carpio) with a stepwise Percoll gradient. The purified rod fraction contained almost no other kinds of cells besides rods, and the purified cone fraction contained a mixture of red-, green-, and blue-sensitive cones in the ratio 3: approximately 1: approximately 1. We prepared membrane preparations from the rod and the cone fraction, and in these membranes, we measured activation efficiencies of the reactions in the phototransduction cascade. The results showed that the signal amplification is lower in the cone membranes, which accounts for the lower light sensitivity in cones. Furthermore, we measured the time courses of visual pigment phosphorylation. The result showed that the phosphorylation is much faster in the cone membranes, which also explains the lower light sensitivity and, in addition, the briefer photoresponse in cones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11707584      PMCID: PMC61164          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.241396898

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  25 in total

Review 1.  Adaptation in vertebrate photoreceptors.

Authors:  G L Fain; H R Matthews; M C Cornwall; Y Koutalos
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 37.312

2.  The gain of rod phototransduction: reconciliation of biochemical and electrophysiological measurements.

Authors:  I B Leskov; V A Klenchin; J W Handy; G G Whitlock; V I Govardovskii; M D Bownds; T D Lamb; E N Pugh; V Y Arshavsky
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  The membrane current of single rod outer segments.

Authors:  D A Baylor; T D Lamb; K W Yau
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Amino acid residues of S-modulin responsible for interaction with rhodopsin kinase.

Authors:  S Tachibanaki; K Nanda; K Sasaki; K Ozaki; S Kawamura
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-02-04       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 5.  Visual pigment: G-protein-coupled receptor for light signals.

Authors:  Y Shichida; H Imai
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 9.261

6.  Sodium-dependent calcium extrusion and sensitivity regulation in retinal cones of the salamander.

Authors:  K Nakatani; K W Yau
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Spectral response curves of single cones in the carp.

Authors:  T Tomita; A Kaneko; M Murakami; E L Pautler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1967-07       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Purification of cone visual pigments from chicken retina.

Authors:  T Okano; Y Fukada; I D Artamonov; T Yoshizawa
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1989-10-31       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Characterization of a bovine cone photoreceptor phosphodiesterase purified by cyclic GMP-sepharose chromatography.

Authors:  P G Gillespie; J A Beavo
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1988-06-15       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  In situ cGMP phosphodiesterase and photoreceptor potential in gecko retina.

Authors:  S Kawamura; M Murakami
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 4.086

View more
  48 in total

1.  Role of visual pigment properties in rod and cone phototransduction.

Authors:  Vladimir Kefalov; Yingbin Fu; Nicholas Marsh-Armstrong; King-Wai Yau
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-10-02       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Rod and cone visual pigments and phototransduction through pharmacological, genetic, and physiological approaches.

Authors:  Vladimir J Kefalov
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Rod phosphodiesterase-6 PDE6A and PDE6B subunits are enzymatically equivalent.

Authors:  Hakim Muradov; Kimberly K Boyd; Nikolai O Artemyev
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Dephosphorylation during bleach and regeneration of visual pigment in carp rod and cone membranes.

Authors:  Hiromi Yamaoka; Shuji Tachibanaki; Satoru Kawamura
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Breaking the covalent bond--a pigment property that contributes to desensitization in cones.

Authors:  Vladimir J Kefalov; Maureen E Estevez; Massahiro Kono; Patrice W Goletz; Rosalie K Crouch; M Carter Cornwall; King-Wai Yau
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2005-06-16       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Rod and cone opsin families differ in spectral tuning domains but not signal transducing domains as judged by saturated evolutionary trace analysis.

Authors:  Karen L Carleton; Tyrone C Spady; Rick H Cote
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2005-06-16       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 7.  Phototransduction in mouse rods and cones.

Authors:  Yingbin Fu; King-Wai Yau
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2007-01-17       Impact factor: 3.657

8.  The dynamics of phosphodiesterase activation in rods and cones.

Authors:  Jürgen Reingruber; David Holcman
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-12-07       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Substrate specificity and subcellular localization of the aldehyde-alcohol redox-coupling reaction in carp cones.

Authors:  Shinya Sato; Takashi Fukagawa; Shuji Tachibanaki; Yumiko Yamano; Akimori Wada; Satoru Kawamura
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Light responses of primate and other mammalian cones.

Authors:  Li-Hui Cao; Dong-Gen Luo; King-Wai Yau
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.