Literature DB >> 11707097

The inhibition of imitative response tendencies.

M Brass1, S Zysset, D Y von Cramon.   

Abstract

Recent neurocognitive studies show that perception and execution of actions are intimately linked. The mere observation of an action seems to evoke a tendency to execute that action. Since such imitative response tendencies are not adaptive in many everyday situations imitative response tendencies usually have to be inhibited. These inhibitory processes have never been investigated using brain imaging techniques. Former work on response inhibition and interference control has focused on paradigms such as the Stroop task or the go/no-go task. We have carried out an event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study in order to investigate the cortical mechanisms underlying the inhibition of imitative responses. The experiment employs a simple response task in which subjects were instructed to execute predefined finger movements (tapping or lifting of the index finger) in response to an observed congruent or incongruent finger movement (tapping or lifting). A comparison of brain activation in incongruent and congruent trials revealed strong activation in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (middle frontal gyrus) and activation in the right frontopolar cortex and the right anterior parietal cortex, as well as in the precuneus. These results support the assumption of prefrontal involvement in response inhibition and extend this assumption to a "new" class of prepotent responses, namely, to imitative actions. Copyright 2001 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11707097     DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0944

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  46 in total

1.  Negative correlation between right prefrontal activity during response inhibition and impulsiveness: a fMRI study.

Authors:  Shuji Asahi; Yasumasa Okamoto; Go Okada; Shigeto Yamawaki; Norio Yokota
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.270

2.  Evidence for asymmetric inhibitory activity during motor planning phases of sensorimotor synchronization.

Authors:  Andrew R Mayer; Faith M Hanlon; Nicholas A Shaff; David D Stephenson; Josef M Ling; Andrew B Dodd; Jeremy Hogeveen; Davin K Quinn; Sephira G Ryman; Sarah Pirio-Richardson
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 4.027

3.  Disentangling Neural Sources of the Motor Interference Effect in High Functioning Autism: An EEG-Study.

Authors:  Eliane Deschrijver; Jan R Wiersema; Marcel Brass
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2017-03

4.  Observation of a finger or an object movement primes imitative responses differentially.

Authors:  M Jonas; K Biermann-Ruben; K Kessler; R Lange; T Bäumer; H R Siebner; A Schnitzler; A Münchau
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-08-31       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Neurofunctional modulation of brain regions by distinct forms of motor cognition and movement features.

Authors:  Martina Piefke; Kira Kramer; Mia Korte; Martin Schulte-Rüther; Jan M Korte; Afra M Wohlschläger; Jochen Weber; Nadim J Shah; Walter Huber; Gereon R Fink
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Building a motor simulation de novo: observation of dance by dancers.

Authors:  Emily S Cross; Antonia F de C Hamilton; Scott T Grafton
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-03-10       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Inhibition of imitative behaviour and social cognition.

Authors:  Marcel Brass; Perrine Ruby; Stephanie Spengler
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Control of shared representations relies on key processes involved in mental state attribution.

Authors:  Stephanie Spengler; D Yves von Cramon; Marcel Brass
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Corticospinal excitability is specifically modulated by the social dimension of observed actions.

Authors:  Luisa Sartori; Andrea Cavallo; Giulia Bucchioni; Umberto Castiello
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  The interaction between felt touch and tactile consequences of observed actions: an action-based somatosensory congruency paradigm.

Authors:  Eliane Deschrijver; Jan R Wiersema; Marcel Brass
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 3.436

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.