OBJECTIVE: To clarify the observed variability of digoxin disposition by performing a population pharmacokinetic analysis in a Japanese population. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of clinical pharmacokinetic data. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: Data were obtained from 106 patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation (43 males and 63 females). METHODS: Digoxin concentrations in serum were measured by fluorescence polarisation immunoassay. Population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using a 2-compartment open pharmacokinetic model with the computer program NONMEM. RESULTS: 246 serum concentrations were obtained. Final pharmacokinetic parameters were: CL (L/h) = (0.036 x TBW + 0.112 x CL(CR)) x 0.77SPI x 0.784CCB, V1 = 1.83 L/kg, V2 = 22.6 L/kg and Q = 0.629 L/h/kg, where CL is total body clearance, V1 and V2 are the apparent volumes of distribution in the central and peripheral compartments, Q is intercompartmental clearance, TBW is total bodyweight (in kg), CL(CR) is creatinine clearance (in ml/min), SPI = 1 for concomitant administration of spironolactone (and zero otherwise) and CCB = 1 for concomitant administration of calcium antagonists (and zero otherwise). Concomitant administration of digoxin and spironolactone resulted in a 23% decrease in digoxin clearance. Concomitant administration of digoxin and calcium antagonists (diltiazem, nicardipine, nifedipine or verapamil) resulted in a 21.6% decrease in digoxin clearance. CONCLUSIONS: The estimated population parameter values may assist clinicians in the individualisation of digoxin dosage regimens.
OBJECTIVE: To clarify the observed variability of digoxin disposition by performing a population pharmacokinetic analysis in a Japanese population. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of clinical pharmacokinetic data. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: Data were obtained from 106 patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation (43 males and 63 females). METHODS:Digoxin concentrations in serum were measured by fluorescence polarisation immunoassay. Population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using a 2-compartment open pharmacokinetic model with the computer program NONMEM. RESULTS: 246 serum concentrations were obtained. Final pharmacokinetic parameters were: CL (L/h) = (0.036 x TBW + 0.112 x CL(CR)) x 0.77SPI x 0.784CCB, V1 = 1.83 L/kg, V2 = 22.6 L/kg and Q = 0.629 L/h/kg, where CL is total body clearance, V1 and V2 are the apparent volumes of distribution in the central and peripheral compartments, Q is intercompartmental clearance, TBW is total bodyweight (in kg), CL(CR) is creatinine clearance (in ml/min), SPI = 1 for concomitant administration of spironolactone (and zero otherwise) and CCB = 1 for concomitant administration of calcium antagonists (and zero otherwise). Concomitant administration of digoxin and spironolactone resulted in a 23% decrease in digoxin clearance. Concomitant administration of digoxin and calcium antagonists (diltiazem, nicardipine, nifedipine or verapamil) resulted in a 21.6% decrease in digoxin clearance. CONCLUSIONS: The estimated population parameter values may assist clinicians in the individualisation of digoxin dosage regimens.
Authors: Y Tanigawara; N Okamura; M Hirai; M Yasuhara; K Ueda; N Kioka; T Komano; R Hori Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 1992-11 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: S Waldorff; J D Andersen; N Heebøll-Nielsen; O G Nielsen; E Moltke; U Sørensen; E Steiness Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 1978-08 Impact factor: 6.875