Literature DB >> 11706922

Antibacterials for the prophylaxis and treatment of bacterial endocarditis in children.

B Capitano1, R Quintiliani, C H Nightingale, D P Nicolau.   

Abstract

Although the overall incidence of infective endocarditis in the paediatric population is considered to be low, over the last 20 years a rising trend in infective endocarditis has been observed among children. This could be due to several reasons including the availability of improved diagnostic techniques, use of continuous central venous catheters and cardiac implants increasing the risk of infection, and the survival of a greater number of infants with congenital heart disease as a result of improved medical management. The predominant causative organisms of paediatric endocarditis include staphylococci and streptococci. There is increased concern surrounding the emergence of endocarditis in children caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and drug resistant strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae. The treatment approach to paediatric endocarditis is similar to that for adult patients with endocarditis because of similarities in disease pathogenesis and aetiology. The therapeutic goal is to achieve sterilisation of the cardiac vegetations. The choice of antibacterial is dependent upon the susceptibility profile of the causative organism. Vancomycin or gentamicin is recommended for enterococcal endocarditis, according to guidelines from the American Heart Association. For staphylococcal endocarditis in patients with no prosthetic valve, oxacillin or nafcillin with or without gentamicin is the treatment of choice. In the case of endocarditis caused by methicillin-resistant S. aureus, vancomycin is commonly used in patients with no prosthetic valve and a combination of vancomycin, gentamicin and rifampicin (rifampin) for patients with prosthetic material. Cefazolin or ceftriaxone is the treatment of choice for penicillin allergic paediatric patients with endocarditis caused by viridans streptococci. While there have been no major changes in endocarditis therapy for the last decade, the current focus is on the recognition of multiple-drug resistant pathogens and the use of newer agents such as quinupristin/dalfopristin in the treatment of resistant bacterial endocarditis. Prophylactic antibacterial therapy is recommended for procedures thought to be associated with the occurrence of bacteraemia involving organisms commonly associated with endocarditis. These include dental extractions and oral, respiratory tract, genitourinary, gastrointestinal or oesophageal procedures. Prophylactic antibacterials recommended by the American Heart Association during genitourinary and gastrointestinal surgical procedures in high risk patients include ampicillin + gentamicin or vancomycin + gentamicin in high risk patients with penicillin allergy. Ampicillin has been recommended for prophylaxis of bacterial endocarditis in children undergoing oral, respiratory tract or oesophageal procedures. In the case of penicillin allergy in these patients, cephalosporins, clindamycin, azithromycin or clarithromycin have been recommended. The general consensus is that antibacterial prophylaxis during dental procedure is unnecessary, and in fact propagates bacterial resistance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11706922     DOI: 10.2165/00128072-200103100-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paediatr Drugs        ISSN: 1174-5878            Impact factor:   3.022


  60 in total

Review 1.  In vivo antibiotic synergism: contribution of animal models.

Authors:  B Fantin; C Carbon
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Influence of resistance to streptogramin A type antibiotics on the activity of quinupristin-dalfopristin in vitro and in experimental endocarditis due to Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  V Zarrouk; B Bozdogan; R Leclercq; L Garry; C Carbon; B Fantin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Infective endocarditis: 35 years of experience at a children's hospital.

Authors:  J M Martin; W H Neches; E R Wald
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  A forty-year review of bacterial endocarditis in infancy and childhood.

Authors:  D H Johnson; A Rosenthal; A S Nadas
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 5.  Infective endocarditis prophylaxis in children.

Authors:  P Venugopalan; E A Worthing
Journal:  Hosp Med       Date:  1998-09

Review 6.  Prevention of bacterial endocarditis.

Authors:  M H Gewitz
Journal:  Curr Opin Pediatr       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.856

7.  Infective endocarditis in children with congenital heart disease: the changing spectrum, 1965-85.

Authors:  T Geva; M Frand
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 29.983

8.  Apparent failures of endocarditis prophylaxis. Analysis of 52 cases submitted to a national registry.

Authors:  D T Durack; E L Kaplan; A L Bisno
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1983-11-04       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Rate of methicillin penetration into normal heart valve and experimental endocarditis lesions.

Authors:  F M Gengo; J J Schentag
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Pediatric infective endocarditis in the modern era.

Authors:  L Saiman; A Prince; W M Gersony
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.406

View more
  1 in total

1.  Body piercing and endocarditis in children.

Authors:  J E Moore; B C Millar
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2003 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.568

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.