Literature DB >> 11706761

Involvement of three or more lymph nodes predicts poor prognosis in submucosal gastric carcinoma.

S Shimada1, Y Yagi, U Honmyo, K Shiomori, N Yoshida, M Ogawa.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multivariate analyses has shown that the status of lymph node metastasis and the depth of tumor penetration through the gastric wall are the most important prognostic factors in patients with advanced gastric carcinoma after curative operation. A clinicopathological study was carried out to clarify a simple and optimal prognostic indicator for early gastric cancer.
METHODS: Retrospective analyses of 982 patients with early gastric cancer (562 with mucosal [M] and 420 with submucosal [SM] tumor) treated by gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection were performed.
RESULTS: The incidence of lymph node metastasis from M and SM tumors was 2.5% (14/562) and 20.2% (85/420), respectively. There were no apparent prognostic indicators in patients with M tumors. In patients with SM tumors, the cancer-specific 5-year survival of those with lymph node metastasis was significantly lower than that of those without such metastasis (77.6% vs 98.2%; P < 0.001). An sharp decrease in survival was seen between patients with two positive nodes and those with three positive nodes, and the cancer-specific 5-year survival rate of patients with three or more metastatic lymph nodes was significantly lower than that of those with one or two nodes (P < 0.001; univariate analysis). Multivariate analysis revealed that the involvement of three or more lymph nodes was the sole independent prognostic determinant (P = 0.016); the level of nodal metastasis was not an independent prognostic factor (P = 0.384). All patients with N2 lymph node echelons (according to the Japanese Research Society for Gastric Cancer classification of the draining lymph nodes of the stomach) in the group with one or two positive nodes survived for more than 5 years.
CONCLUSION: The sole independent prognostic factor in SM gastric cancer is the involvement of three or more metastatic lymph nodes. We suggest that this simple prognostic indicator for the follow-up of early gastric cancer, and this could lead to potentially effective adjuvant chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11706761     DOI: 10.1007/pl00011724

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastric Cancer        ISSN: 1436-3291            Impact factor:   7.370


  16 in total

1.  Factors related to lymph node metastasis and surgical strategy used to treat early gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  Dong Yi Kim; Jae Kyoon Joo; Seong Yeob Ryu; Young Jin Kim; Shin Kon Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Trends in characteristics of surgically treated early gastric cancer patients after the introduction of gastric cancer treatment guidelines in Japan.

Authors:  Norimitsu Tanaka; Hitoshi Katai; Hirokazu Taniguchi; Makoto Saka; Shinji Morita; Takeo Fukagawa; Takuji Gotoda
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2010-07-03       Impact factor: 7.370

3.  Confirmation of the posterior gastric artery using multi-detector row computed tomography.

Authors:  Takehiro Okabayashi; Michiya Kobayashi; Satoshi Morishita; Takeki Sugimoto; Toyokazu Akimori; Tsutomu Namikawa; Ken Okamoto; Norihiro Hokimoto; Keijiro Araki
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 7.370

4.  Predicting lymph node metastases in early gastric cancer: radical resection or organ-sparing therapy?

Authors:  Alexander R Novotny; Christoph Schuhmacher
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 5.  Redefining early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Savio G Barreto; John A Windsor
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Number of lymph node metastases is a significant prognostic factor in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Takahito Nakagawa; Toshiya Kamiyama; Nobuaki Kurauchi; Michiaki Matsushita; Kazuaki Nakanishi; Hirofumi Kamachi; Takeaki Kudo; Satoru Todo
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Exploratory Analysis to Find Unfavorable Subset of Stage II Gastric Cancer for Which Surgery Alone Is the Standard Treatment; Another Target for Adjuvant Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Toru Aoyama; Takaki Yoshikawa; Hirohito Fujikawa; Tsutomu Hayashi; Takashi Ogata; Haruhiko Cho; Takanobu Yamada; Shinichi Hasegawa; Kazuhito Tsuchida; Norio Yukawa; Takashi Oshima; Yasushi Rino; Munetaka Masuda
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec

8.  Autopsy study of anatomical features of the posterior gastric artery for surgical contribution.

Authors:  Takehiro Okabayashi; Michiya Kobayashi; Isao Nishimori; Kazuya Yuri; Takanori Miki; Yoshiki Takeuchi; Saburo Onishi; Kazuhiro Hanazaki; Keijiro Araki
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-09-07       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Recurrence in early gastric cancer with lymph node metastasis.

Authors:  Makoto Saka; Hitoshi Katai; Takeo Fukagawa; Rajwinder Nijjar; Takeshi Sano
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2009-01-08       Impact factor: 7.370

10.  Correlation of tumor-positive ratio and number of perigastric lymph nodes with prognosis of patients with surgically-removed gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  Yong-Bin Ding; Guo-Yu Chen; Jian-Guo Xia; Xi-Wei Zang; Hong-Yu Yang; Li Yang; Yue-Xian Liu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.