PURPOSE: Suppressin (SPN), a novel inhibitor of the entry into the cell cycle, has properties of a tumor suppressor gene; however, its role in the development and progression of a human malignancy is not studied. Therefore, we evaluated the status of spn and its prognostic value in human colorectal adenocarcinoma (CRC). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Inhibition of cell proliferation by exogenous/extracellular SPN was assessed by [(3)H]thymidine incorporation. The genetic status of spn in two colon cancer cell lines (LS180 and WiDr) and in a human CRC was determined using direct cDNA sequencing techniques. Phenotypic expression of SPN was evaluated in 105 CRC archival tissues using immunohistochemical methods. Univariate Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine the prognostic significance of SPN expression. RESULTS: Exogenous SPN inhibited the proliferation of the LS180 cell line, which also has a mutation in one allele of the spn gene. The spn gene was also mutated in the primary CRC. Expression of SPN was primarily cytoplasmic in nonmucinous CRCs and nuclear in mucinous CRCs. However, the evaluation of 85 nonmucinous CRCs demonstrated that nuclear localization of SPN, nuclear accumulation of p53, and nodal status were independent prognostic indicators with hazard ratios of 2.34, 2.33, and 3.04, respectively. Nuclear localization of SPN plus nuclear accumulation of p53 formed a stronger prognostic indicator (hazard ratios = 5.45) than local nodal status. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report of genetic alterations in the spn gene in a human malignancy and suggests that genetic alterations in spn and the resulting immunohistochemical phenotypes based on SPN subcellular localization in CRCs may be useful in determining prognosis of patients with subtypes of CRC.
PURPOSE:Suppressin (SPN), a novel inhibitor of the entry into the cell cycle, has properties of a tumor suppressor gene; however, its role in the development and progression of a humanmalignancy is not studied. Therefore, we evaluated the status of spn and its prognostic value in humancolorectal adenocarcinoma (CRC). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Inhibition of cell proliferation by exogenous/extracellular SPN was assessed by [(3)H]thymidine incorporation. The genetic status of spn in two colon cancer cell lines (LS180 and WiDr) and in a human CRC was determined using direct cDNA sequencing techniques. Phenotypic expression of SPN was evaluated in 105 CRC archival tissues using immunohistochemical methods. Univariate Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine the prognostic significance of SPN expression. RESULTS: Exogenous SPN inhibited the proliferation of the LS180 cell line, which also has a mutation in one allele of the spn gene. The spn gene was also mutated in the primary CRC. Expression of SPN was primarily cytoplasmic in nonmucinous CRCs and nuclear in mucinous CRCs. However, the evaluation of 85 nonmucinous CRCs demonstrated that nuclear localization of SPN, nuclear accumulation of p53, and nodal status were independent prognostic indicators with hazard ratios of 2.34, 2.33, and 3.04, respectively. Nuclear localization of SPN plus nuclear accumulation of p53 formed a stronger prognostic indicator (hazard ratios = 5.45) than local nodal status. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report of genetic alterations in the spn gene in a humanmalignancy and suggests that genetic alterations in spn and the resulting immunohistochemical phenotypes based on SPN subcellular localization in CRCs may be useful in determining prognosis of patients with subtypes of CRC.
Authors: Venkat R Katkoori; Catalina Suarez-Cuervo; Chandrakumar Shanmugam; Nirag C Jhala; Tom Callens; Ludwine Messiaen; James Posey; Harvey L Bumpers; Sreelatha Meleth; William E Grizzle; Upender Manne Journal: J Gastrointest Oncol Date: 2010-12
Authors: Upender Manne; Chandrakumar Shanmugam; Venkat R Katkoori; Harvey L Bumpers; William E Grizzle Journal: Cancer Biomark Date: 2010 Impact factor: 4.388
Authors: Anneke T Vulto-van Silfhout; Shivakumar Rajamanickam; Philip J Jensik; Sarah Vergult; Nina de Rocker; Kathryn J Newhall; Ramya Raghavan; Sara N Reardon; Kelsey Jarrett; Tara McIntyre; Joseph Bulinski; Stacy L Ownby; Jodi I Huggenvik; G Stanley McKnight; Gregory M Rose; Xiang Cai; Andy Willaert; Christiane Zweier; Sabine Endele; Joep de Ligt; Bregje W M van Bon; Dorien Lugtenberg; Petra F de Vries; Joris A Veltman; Hans van Bokhoven; Han G Brunner; Anita Rauch; Arjan P M de Brouwer; Gemma L Carvill; Alexander Hoischen; Heather C Mefford; Evan E Eichler; Lisenka E L M Vissers; Björn Menten; Michael W Collard; Bert B A de Vries Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2014-04-10 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Dominik D Alexander; John Waterbor; Timothy Hughes; Ellen Funkhouser; William Grizzle; Upender Manne Journal: Cancer Biomark Date: 2007 Impact factor: 4.388
Authors: Philip J Jensik; Jesse D Vargas; Sara N Reardon; Shivakumar Rajamanickam; Jodi I Huggenvik; Michael W Collard Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-12-22 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Wen-Lin Kuo; Debopriya Das; Safiyyah Ziyad; Sanchita Bhattacharya; William J Gibb; Laura M Heiser; Anguraj Sadanandam; Gerald V Fontenay; Zhi Hu; Nicholas J Wang; Nora Bayani; Heidi S Feiler; Richard M Neve; Andrew J Wyrobek; Paul T Spellman; Laurence J Marton; Joe W Gray Journal: BMC Med Date: 2009-12-14 Impact factor: 8.775
Authors: Alban Ordureau; Karine Enesa; Sambit Nanda; Brice Le Francois; Mark Peggie; Alan Prescott; Paul R Albert; Philip Cohen Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2013-07-11 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Sreelatha Meleth; Chakrapani Chatla; Venkat R Katkoori; Billie Anderson; James M Hardin; Nirag C Jhala; Al Bartolucci; William E Grizzle; Upender Manne Journal: Cancer Inform Date: 2007-03-02