PURPOSE: METH-1/hADAMTS-1 and METH-2/hADAMTS-8 are recently identified genes that inhibit angiogenesis, and the murine homologue, ADAMTS-1, shows metalloproteinase function. Because the significance of METH-1 and METH-2 has not been determined in solid tumors, we examined the mRNA expressions of these molecules in pancreatic cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: METH-1 and METH-2 mRNA expressions were identified in six pancreatic cancer cell lines and were quantified by TaqMan reverse transcription-PCR in 18 paired samples of pancreatic cancer and surrounding noncancerous pancreas, and in 14 samples of pancreatic cancer. METH-1 mRNA expression was also examined in 16 pairs of HCC and cirrhotic liver. Vascularity was estimated by CD34 staining. The correlation between clinicopathological factors and METH-1 expression was additionally analyzed. RESULTS: Four of six pancreatic cancer cell lines expressed METH-1, and 1/6 expressed METH-2. METH-1 was substantially expressed in both pancreatic cancer and noncancerous pancreas, but METH-2 was not. METH-1 expression in pancreatic cancer tissue was significantly lower than that in noncancerous pancreas (P = 0.002), and a similar result was obtained between HCC and cirrhotic liver (P = 0.003). METH-1 expression did not show a significant correlation with vascularity in pancreatic cancer or in HCC. However, pancreatic cancer with higher expression of METH-1 showed significantly severe lymph node metastasis or retroperitoneal invasion (P = 0.033 and P = 0.018, respectively) and worse prognosis (P = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: METH-1, which was initially reported to have a potent antiangiogenic effect, does not seem to be a predominant determinant of tumor vascularity in pancreatic cancer. Rather, METH-1 seems to be involved in progression of pancreatic cancer through local invasion and lymph node metastasis.
PURPOSE:METH-1/hADAMTS-1 and METH-2/hADAMTS-8 are recently identified genes that inhibit angiogenesis, and the murine homologue, ADAMTS-1, shows metalloproteinase function. Because the significance of METH-1 and METH-2 has not been determined in solid tumors, we examined the mRNA expressions of these molecules in pancreatic cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN:METH-1 and METH-2 mRNA expressions were identified in six pancreatic cancer cell lines and were quantified by TaqMan reverse transcription-PCR in 18 paired samples of pancreatic cancer and surrounding noncancerous pancreas, and in 14 samples of pancreatic cancer. METH-1 mRNA expression was also examined in 16 pairs of HCC and cirrhotic liver. Vascularity was estimated by CD34 staining. The correlation between clinicopathological factors and METH-1 expression was additionally analyzed. RESULTS: Four of six pancreatic cancer cell lines expressed METH-1, and 1/6 expressed METH-2. METH-1 was substantially expressed in both pancreatic cancer and noncancerous pancreas, but METH-2 was not. METH-1 expression in pancreatic cancer tissue was significantly lower than that in noncancerous pancreas (P = 0.002), and a similar result was obtained between HCC and cirrhotic liver (P = 0.003). METH-1 expression did not show a significant correlation with vascularity in pancreatic cancer or in HCC. However, pancreatic cancer with higher expression of METH-1 showed significantly severe lymph node metastasis or retroperitoneal invasion (P = 0.033 and P = 0.018, respectively) and worse prognosis (P = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS:METH-1, which was initially reported to have a potent antiangiogenic effect, does not seem to be a predominant determinant of tumor vascularity in pancreatic cancer. Rather, METH-1 seems to be involved in progression of pancreatic cancer through local invasion and lymph node metastasis.
Authors: Carmela Ricciardelli; Kate M Frewin; Izza de Arao Tan; Elizabeth D Williams; Kenneth Opeskin; Melanie A Pritchard; Wendy V Ingman; Darryl L Russell Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2011-10-12 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Guido von Figura; Akihisa Fukuda; Nilotpal Roy; Muluye E Liku; John P Morris Iv; Grace E Kim; Holger A Russ; Matthew A Firpo; Sean J Mulvihill; David W Dawson; Jorge Ferrer; William F Mueller; Anke Busch; Klemens J Hertel; Matthias Hebrok Journal: Nat Cell Biol Date: 2014-02-23 Impact factor: 28.824
Authors: Joo Mi Yi; Angela A Guzzetta; Vasudev J Bailey; Stephanie R Downing; Leander Van Neste; Katherine B Chiappinelli; Brian P Keeley; Alejandro Stark; Alexander Herrera; Christopher Wolfgang; Emmanouil P Pappou; Christine A Iacobuzio-Donahue; Michael G Goggins; James G Herman; Tza-Huei Wang; Stephen B Baylin; Nita Ahuja Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2013-10-02 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: J R Dunn; D Panutsopulos; M W Shaw; J Heighway; R Dormer; E N Salmo; S G Watson; J K Field; T Liloglou Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2004-09-13 Impact factor: 7.640