Literature DB >> 11705559

Extent of ST-segment deviation in a single electrocardiogram lead 90 min after thrombolysis as a predictor of medium-term mortality in acute myocardial infarction.

K Schröder1, K Wegscheider, U Zeymer, U Tebbe, R Schröder.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In evolving myocardial infarction, assessment of the sum of early resolution of ST-segment elevation (sumSTR) has become an established method to predict outcome. We have found previously that mortality is predicted more accurately by the existing ST-segment deviation in the single electrocardiograph (ECG) lead with maximum deviation (maxSTE) 90 min after start of thrombolysis. This report compares the power to predict medium-term mortality by these two approaches.
METHODS: An ST-segment resolution substudy was done in conjunction with the Intravenous nPA for Treatment of Infarcting Myocardium Early (InTIME) II Study, which compared mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction randomly assigned lanoteplase or alteplase. In 2719 patients, a 12-lead ECG was assessed at baseline and 90 min after the start of thrombolytic therapy.
FINDINGS: MaxSTE achieved a better combination of sensitivities and specificities for mortality prediction than sumSTR. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curves for 180-day mortality prediction was 0.680 for maxSTE and 0.622 for sumSTR (difference 0.058; 95% CI 0.027-0.088). Risk groups categorised at low, medium, or high risk by maxSTE comprised 43%, 32%, and 24% of patients and those by complete, partial, or no sumSTR comprised 40%, 36%, and 24% of all patients. The 180-day mortality rates for the three maxSTE risk groups were 3.1%, 7.1%, and 16.2%, and those for the sumSTR groups were 4.8%, 8.1%, and 11.7%. The 12-month Kaplan-Meier estimates were 4.1%, 8.8%, and 18.6%, and 5.9%, 9.9%, and 13.7%, respectively.
INTERPRETATION: MaxSTE predicts early and medium-term mortality more accurately than does sumSTR. The prognosis for an individual patient can be accurately estimated simply by the ST-segment deviation present in one ECG lead recorded 90 min after thrombolysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11705559     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06577-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  18 in total

1.  [Prediction of outcome in ST elevation myocardial infarction by the extent of ST segment deviation recovery. Which method is best?].

Authors:  K Schröder; U Zeymer; W Wegschneider; R Schröder
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  2004-08

Review 2.  Role of Sam68 as an adaptor protein in signal transduction.

Authors:  S Najib; C Martín-Romero; C González-Yanes; V Sánchez-Margalet
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 9.261

3.  ST elevation after myocardial infarction: what does it mean?

Authors:  L A Piérard
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Clinical trial updates and hotline sessions presented at the Scientific Session 2007 of the American Heart Association.

Authors:  U Laufs; H Nef; H Möllmann; F Custodis; M Böhm
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2007-12-18       Impact factor: 5.460

5.  Serum NT-proBNP on admission can predict ST-segment resolution in patients with acute myocardial infarction after primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Bin Peng; Hao Xia; Aihua Ni; Gang Wu; Xuejun Jiang
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 1.443

6.  The ECG in acute coronary syndromes: new tricks from an old dog.

Authors:  H S Gurm; E J Topol
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  Early versus late ST-segment resolution and clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  H B van der Zwaan; M G Stoel; J W Roos-Hesselink; G Veen; E Boersma; C von Birgelen
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.380

8.  Relation between different methods for analysing ST segment deviation and infarct size as assessed by positron emission tomography.

Authors:  W J Desmet; L V Mesotten; A F Maes; H P Heidbüchel; L A Mortelmans; F J Van de Werf
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 9.  [Thrombolysis in ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Current role in the light of recent studies].

Authors:  H-R Arntz; U Zeymer; P Schwimmbeck
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.041

10.  Comparison of different methods of ST segment resolution analysis for prediction of 1-year mortality after primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Jakub Przyluski; Maciej Karcz; Lukasz Kalińczuk; Mariusz Kruk; Jerzy Pregowski; Edyta Kaczmarska; Joanna Petryka; Paweł Bekta; Tomasz Deptuch; Cezary Kepka; Adam Witkowski; Witold Ruzyllo
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.