Literature DB >> 11705125

Modeling for health care and other policy decisions: uses, roles, and validity.

M C Weinstein1, E L Toy, E A Sandberg, P J Neumann, J S Evans, K M Kuntz, J D Graham, J K Hammitt.   

Abstract

The role of models to support recommendations on the cost-effective use of medical technologies and pharmaceuticals is controversial. At the heart of the controversy is the degree to which experimental or other empirical evidence should be required prior to model use. The controversy stems in part from a misconception that the role of models is to establish truth rather than to guide clinical and policy decisions. In other domains of public policy that involve human life and health, such as environmental protection and defense strategy, models are generally accepted as decision aids, and many models have been formally incorporated into regulatory processes and governmental decision making. We formulate an analytical framework for evaluating the role of models as aids to decision making. Implications for the implementation of Section 114 of the Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act (FDAMA) are derived from this framework.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11705125     DOI: 10.1046/j.1524-4733.2001.45061.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Value Health        ISSN: 1098-3015            Impact factor:   5.725


  57 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacoeconomics of lipid-lowering drugs.

Authors:  Dean G Smith
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.113

2.  A role for two-stage pharmacoeconomic appraisal? Is there a role for interim approval of a drug for reimbursement based on modelling studies with subsequent full approval using phase III data?

Authors:  Suzanne Hill; Nick Freemantle
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Evidence from cost-effectiveness research.

Authors:  Katia Noyes; Robert G Holloway
Journal:  NeuroRx       Date:  2004-07

4.  Pharmacoeconomic analyses using discrete event simulation.

Authors:  J Jaime Caro
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  Good practice guidelines for decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment: a review and consolidation of quality assessment.

Authors:  Zoë Philips; Laura Bojke; Mark Sculpher; Karl Claxton; Su Golder
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 6.  It's time to choose the study design!: net benefit analysis of alternative study designs to acquire information for evaluation of health technologies.

Authors:  Oren Shavit; Moshe Leshno; Assaf Goldberger; Amir Shmueli; Amnon Hoffman
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Better analysis for better decisions: has pharmacoeconomics come of age?

Authors:  Michael Drummond; Mark Sculpher
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 8.  Cost-effectiveness analyses of vaccination programmes : a focused review of modelling approaches.

Authors:  Sun-Young Kim; Sue J Goldie
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.981

9.  Do economic evaluations of targeted therapy provide support for decision makers?

Authors:  Ilia L Ferrusi; Natasha B Leighl; Nathalie A Kulin; Deborah A Marshall
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.840

10.  Comparative effectiveness of alternative prostate-specific antigen--based prostate cancer screening strategies: model estimates of potential benefits and harms.

Authors:  Roman Gulati; John L Gore; Ruth Etzioni
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 25.391

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.