Literature DB >> 11705009

Increasing research capacity and changing the culture of primary care towards reflective inquiring practice: the experience of the West London Research Network (WeLReN).

P Thomas1, A While.   

Abstract

A number of primary care research networks were set up throughout England in 1998 in order to (1) improve the quality of primary care research (2) increase the research capacity of primary care, and (3) change the culture of primary care towards reflective inquiring practice (NHSE, 2000b). It is not clear how best to operate a network to achieve these diverse aims. This paper describes the first 30 months of a network that adopted a whole system approach in the belief that this would offer the best chance of simultaneously achieving the three aims. A cycle of activity was designed to facilitate the formation of multidisciplinary coalitions of interest for research with complementary 'top down' and 'bottom up' programmes of work co-existing. At least 330 people participated in the generation of research questions of whom one third (33%) were general practitioners, 16% community nurses, 6% practice managers and other primary care practitioners. Over two fifths (43%) were 'key allies'--academics, health authority staff, community workers and project workers. One fifth (110) of all practices (500) in the WeLReN area have collaborated in at least one research project. The ratio of doctor:nurse participation in the 24 research project teams was markedly different in the supported coalitions (2:1) compared to projects devised and led by more experienced researchers (6:1). The evidence suggests that it is possible to operate a primary care research network in a way that develops coalitions of interest from different parts of the health care system as well as both 'top down' and 'bottom up' led projects. It is too early to tell if the approach will be able to achieve its aims in the long-term but the activity data are encouraging. There is a need for more research on the theoretical basis of network operation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11705009     DOI: 10.1080/13561820120039865

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interprof Care        ISSN: 1356-1820            Impact factor:   2.338


  10 in total

1.  The best of times and worst of times.

Authors:  K C Stange
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  How primary care networks can help integrate academic and service initiatives in primary care.

Authors:  Paul Thomas; Jonathan Graffy; Paul Wallace; Mike Kirby
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

3.  Developing primary care: the contribution of primary care research networks.

Authors:  Stephen Peckham; Brian Hutchison
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2012-11

4.  "Not a kidney or a lung:" research challenges in a network of safety net clinics.

Authors:  John Heintzman; Sonja Likumahuwa; Christine Nelson; M Patrice Eiff; Rachel Gold; Joseph E Carroll; John Muench; Christian Hill; Meena Mital; Jennifer E DeVoe
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.756

5.  A framework to evaluate research capacity building in health care.

Authors:  Jo Cooke
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2005-10-27       Impact factor: 2.497

6.  Realist complex intervention science: Applying realist principles across all phases of the Medical Research Council framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions.

Authors:  Adam Fletcher; Farah Jamal; Graham Moore; Rhiannon E Evans; Simon Murphy; Chris Bonell
Journal:  Evaluation (Lond)       Date:  2016-06-02

7.  Building a primary care research network - lessons to learn.

Authors:  Tuomas H Koskela
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 2.581

8.  Setting directions for capacity building in primary health care: a survey of a research network.

Authors:  Karin Ried; Elizabeth A Farmer; Kathryn M Weston
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2006-02-09       Impact factor: 2.497

9.  Building reproductive health research and audit capacity and activity in the Pacific Islands (BRRACAP) study: methods, rationale and baseline results.

Authors:  Alec J Ekeroma; Tim Kenealy; Boaz Shulruf; Lesley M E McCowan; Andrew Hill
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 2.463

10.  Key factors influencing allied health research capacity in a large Australian metropolitan health district.

Authors:  Jennifer A Alison; Bill Zafiropoulos; Robert Heard
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2017-08-09
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.