Literature DB >> 11704970

Modeling choice behavior for new pharmaceutical products.

M F Bingham1, F R Johnson, D Miller.   

Abstract

This paper presents a dynamic generalization of a model often used to aid marketing decisions relating to conventional products. The model uses stated-preference data in a random-utility framework to predict adoption rates for new pharmaceutical products. In addition, this paper employs a Markov model of patient learning in drug selection. While the simple learning rule presented here is only a rough approximation to reality, this model nevertheless systematically incorporates important features including learning and the influence of shifting preferences on market share. Despite its simplifications, the integrated framework of random-utility and product attribute updating presented here is capable of accommodating a variety of pharmaceutical marketing and development problems. This research demonstrates both the strengths of stated-preference market research and some of its shortcomings for pharmaceutical applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11704970     DOI: 10.1046/j.1524-4733.2001.004001032.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Value Health        ISSN: 1098-3015            Impact factor:   5.725


  5 in total

1.  Things are Looking up Since We Started Listening to Patients: Trends in the Application of Conjoint Analysis in Health 1982-2007.

Authors:  John F P Bridges; Elizabeth T Kinter; Lillian Kidane; Rebekah R Heinzen; Colleen McCormick
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  HIV vaccine acceptability among communities at risk: the impact of vaccine characteristics.

Authors:  Peter A Newman; Naihua Duan; Sung-Jae Lee; Ellen T Rudy; Danielle S Seiden; Lisa Kakinami; William E Cunningham
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2005-11-21       Impact factor: 3.641

3.  Preventive pharmacologic treatments for episodic migraine in adults.

Authors:  Tatyana A Shamliyan; Jae-Young Choi; Rema Ramakrishnan; Jennifer Biggs Miller; Shi-Yi Wang; Frederick R Taylor; Robert L Kane
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  How well do discrete choice experiments predict health choices? A systematic review and meta-analysis of external validity.

Authors:  Matthew Quaife; Fern Terris-Prestholt; Gian Luca Di Tanna; Peter Vickerman
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2018-01-29

5.  Are chemotherapy patients' HRQoL importance weights consistent with linear scoring rules? A stated-choice approach.

Authors:  F Reed Johnson; A Brett Hauber; David Osoba; Ming-Ann Hsu; John Coombs; Catherine Copley-Merriman
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.147

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.