Literature DB >> 11704969

A multinational pharmacoeconomic evaluation of acute major depressive disorder (MDD): a comparison of cost-effectiveness between venlafaxine, SSRIs and TCAs.

J J Doyle1, J Casciano, S Arikian, J E Tarride, M A Gonzalez, R Casciano.   

Abstract

METHODS: We conducted a multinational pharmacoeconomic evaluation comparing the immediate release form of a new class of serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI), venlafaxine IR to the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and the tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) in the treatment of acute major depressive disorder (MDD) in 10 countries (Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and Venezuela). We designed a decision analytic model assessing the acute phase of MDD treatment within a 6-month time horizon. Six decision tree models were customized with country-specific estimates from a clinical management analysis, meta-analytic rates from two published meta-analyses, and a resource valuation of treatment costs representing the inpatient and outpatient settings within each country. The meta-analyses provided the clinical rates of success defined as a 50% reduction in depression scores on the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D) or the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Treatment regimen costs were determined from standard lists, fee schedules, and communication with local health economists in each country. The meta-analytic rates were applied to the decision analytic model to calculate the expected cost and expected outcomes for each antidepressant comparator. Cost-effectiveness was determined using the expected values for both a successful outcome, and a composite measure of outcome termed symptom-free days. A policy analysis was conducted to examine the health system budget impact in each country of increasing the utilization of the most effective antidepressant found in our study.
RESULTS: Initiating treatment of MDD with venlafaxine IR yielded a lower expected cost compared to the SSRIs and TCAs in all countries except Poland in the inpatient setting, and Italy and Poland within the outpatient settings. The weighted average expected cost per patient varied from US$632 (Poland) to US$5647 (US) in the six-month acute phase treatment of MDD. The estimated total budgetary impact for each 1% of venlafaxine utilization, assuming a population of one million MDD patients, ranged from US$1600 (Italy) to US$29,049 (US).
CONCLUSIONS: Within the inpatient and outpatient treatment settings, venlafaxine IR was a more cost-effective treatment of MDD compared to the SSRIs and TCAs. Additionally, the results of this investigation indicate that increased utilization of venlafaxine in most settings across Europe and the Americas will have favorable impact on health care payer budgets. ADR, adverse drug reaction; CMA, clinical management analysis; ECT, electroconvulsive therapy; HAM-D, Hamilton Depression Scale; MADRS, Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scale; MDD, major depressive disorder; SFD, symptom-free day; SNRI, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor; SSRI, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor; TCA, tricyclic antidepressant; WHO, world health organization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11704969     DOI: 10.1046/j.1524-4733.2001.004001016.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Value Health        ISSN: 1098-3015            Impact factor:   5.725


  11 in total

1.  Adherence of pharmacoeconomic studies to national guidelines in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Jarir Atthobari; Jasper M Bos; Cornelis Boersma; Jacobus R B J Brouwers; Lolkje T W de Jong-van den Berg; Maarten J Postma
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2005-10

Review 2.  Barriers to generalizability of health economic evaluations in Latin America and the Caribbean region.

Authors:  Federico Augustovski; Cynthia Iglesias; Andrea Manca; Michael Drummond; Adolfo Rubinstein; Sebastián García Martí
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Economic considerations in the prescribing of third-generation antidepressants.

Authors:  Stuart Montgomery; John J Doyle; Lee Stern; Christopher R McBurney
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Do productivity costs matter?: the impact of including productivity costs on the incremental costs of interventions targeted at depressive disorders.

Authors:  Marieke Krol; Jocé Papenburg; Marc Koopmanschap; Werner Brouwer
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  The personal and national costs of mental health conditions: impacts on income, taxes, government support payments due to lost labour force participation.

Authors:  Deborah J Schofield; Rupendra N Shrestha; Richard Percival; Megan E Passey; Emily J Callander; Simon J Kelly
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 3.630

6.  Evaluation of the cost effectiveness of escitalopram versus venlafaxine XR in major depressive disorder.

Authors:  José-Luis Fernandez; Stuart Montgomery; Clément Francois
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 7.  Escitalopram: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in depression.

Authors:  Katherine F Croom; Greg L Plosker
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  Desvenlafaxine in major depressive disorder: an evidence-based review of its place in therapy.

Authors:  Daniel Z Lieberman; Suena H Massey
Journal:  Core Evid       Date:  2010-06-15

Review 9.  Vagus nerve stimulation for epilepsy and depression.

Authors:  Andrew H Milby; Casey H Halpern; Gordon H Baltuch
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 7.620

10.  Methodologies used in cost-effectiveness models for evaluating treatments in major depressive disorder: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sorrel E Wolowacz; Peter M Classi; Julie Birt; Evelina A Zimovetz
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2012-02-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.