Literature DB >> 11704371

Quality of life after balloon angioplasty or stenting for acute myocardial infarction. One-year results from the Stent-PAMI trial.

S Rinfret1, C L Grines, R S Cosgrove, K K Ho, D A Cox, B R Brodie, M C Morice, G W Stone, D J Cohen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to compare the impact of primary stenting or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients undergoing direct angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have demonstrated that coronary stenting reduces clinical and angiographic restenosis compared with PTCA. However, the impact of stenting on HRQOL from the patient's perspective remains unknown.
METHODS: We administered the Seattle Angina Questionnaire and the Medical Outcomes Study Short-form Survey at 1, 6 and 12 months after initial treatment to all North American patients in the Stent-Primary Angioplasty for Myocardial Infarction trial (Stent-PAMI) (n = 509)-a randomized trial comparing primary stenting to conventional PTCA for patients with AMI.
RESULTS: At one month, most HRQOL measures were similar for the two groups, but stent patients reported less bodily pain than PTCA patients (p = 0.03). At six-month follow-up, stenting resulted in significant improvements in several dimensions of HRQOL including reduced anginal frequency and bodily pain as well as improved disease perception (all p < or = 0.03) and a trend towards better anginal stability (p = 0.056). By 12-month follow-up, however, none of these differences remained statistically significant. These differences in HRQOL were largely explained by the greater need for ischemia-driven target-vessel repeat revascularization procedures in PTCA patients during the first six months (16.0% vs. 6.2%, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing revascularization for AMI, initial stent placement is associated with improvements in several dimensions of health status during the first six months of follow-up. In the absence of differences in mortality, these findings add to the overall argument in favor of initial stenting in patients treated with mechanical reperfusion for myocardial infarction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11704371     DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01599-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  13 in total

Review 1.  Drug eluting stents for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: risk and benefit.

Authors:  Jason Ryan; Donald E Cutlip; David J Cohen; Duane S Pinto
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2007-05-05       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 2.  Current Indications for Stenting: Symptoms or Survival CME.

Authors:  Suzanne V Arnold
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar

3.  Reliability and validity of the Norwegian translation of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire following myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Kjell I Pettersen; Aasmund Reikvam; Knut Stavem
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Cost-effectiveness of sirolimus-eluting stents compared with vascular brachytherapy for the treatment of in-stent restenosis.

Authors:  Matthew R Reynolds; Duane S Pinto; Chunxue Shi; Joshua Walczak; Ronna Berezin; David R Holmes; David J Cohen
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2007-09-06       Impact factor: 4.749

5.  Derivation and validation of a risk standardization model for benchmarking hospital performance for health-related quality of life outcomes after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Suzanne V Arnold; Frederick A Masoudi; John S Rumsfeld; Yan Li; Philip G Jones; John A Spertus
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Temporal trends in patient-reported angina at 1 year after percutaneous coronary revascularization in the stent era: a report from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-sponsored 1997-2006 dynamic registry.

Authors:  Lakshmi Venkitachalam; Kevin E Kip; Suresh R Mulukutla; Faith Selzer; Warren Laskey; James Slater; Howard A Cohen; Robert L Wilensky; David O Williams; Oscar C Marroquin; Kim Sutton-Tyrrell; Clareann H Bunker; Sheryl F Kelsey
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2009-10-13

Review 7.  Quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease and the impact of depression.

Authors:  J Robert Swenson
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 8.081

8.  Impact of smoking on health-related quality of Life after percutaneous coronary intervention treated with drug-eluting stents: a longitudinal observational study.

Authors:  Chao Xue; Lin Bian; Yu Shui Xie; Zhao Fang Yin; Zuo Jun Xu; Qi Zhi Chen; Hui Li Zhang; Chang Qian Wang
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 3.186

Review 9.  Interpretation of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire as an Outcome Measure in Clinical Trials and Clinical Care: A Review.

Authors:  Merrill Thomas; Philip G Jones; Suzanne V Arnold; John A Spertus
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 14.676

10.  One-year health status outcomes of unstable angina versus myocardial infarction: a prospective, observational cohort study of ACS survivors.

Authors:  Thomas M Maddox; Kimberly J Reid; John S Rumsfeld; John A Spertus
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2007-09-12       Impact factor: 2.298

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.