Literature DB >> 11703466

Differences in auditory and physiological properties of HVc neurons between reproductively active male and female canaries (Serinus canaria).

C Del Negro1, J M Edeline.   

Abstract

Based on neuronal recordings in the HVc, this study investigated differences between reproductively active male and sexually receptive female canaries. It is the first study to describe auditory responses and cell characteristics of HVc neurons in female songbirds and to compare them with the responses and characteristics obtained in males. Extracellular single unit recordings showed that in males HVc cells exhibited two types of auditory responses to conspecific and heterospecific song playbacks: tonic and phasic responses. The major finding of the present study is the absence of tonic responses in females. Neurons in the HVc of females only responded phasically to song playbacks. In both sexes, neurons exhibiting auditory responses had thinner action potentials than the others. As all the tonic cells recorded in males were thin spike cells (action potential < or = 0.6 ms) [corrected] and had high firing rates (6 Hz in average), they are potentially interneurons. In both sexes, two categories of nonresponsive cells were found: neurons that did not fire at song onset and had the lowest spontaneous firing rate; and neurons that did not exhibit changes in activity in response to song playbacks. Analyses of physiological characteristics of HVc neurons revealed that the rate of spontaneous activity was higher in males than in females. This study is a first step towards identifying [corrected] the cellular bases of the sexual dimorphism in HVc function and highlights the pivotal role of interneurons in HVc auditory processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11703466     DOI: 10.1046/j.0953-816x.2001.01758.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  7 in total

1.  Metabolic cost as a unifying principle governing neuronal biophysics.

Authors:  Andrea Hasenstaub; Stephani Otte; Edward Callaway; Terrence J Sejnowski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  How canaries listen to their song: Species-specific shape of auditory perception.

Authors:  Adam R Fishbein; Shelby L Lawson; Robert J Dooling; Gregory F Ball
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  Auditory-vocal mirroring in songbirds.

Authors:  Richard Mooney
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Functional changes between seasons in the male songbird auditory forebrain.

Authors:  Geert De Groof; Colline Poirier; Isabelle George; Martine Hausberger; Annemie Van der Linden
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 3.558

5.  Temperature manipulation of neuronal dynamics in a forebrain motor control nucleus.

Authors:  Matías A Goldin; Gabriel B Mindlin
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 6.  Sex differences and similarities in the neural circuit regulating song and other reproductive behaviors in songbirds.

Authors:  Gregory F Ball; Jacques Balthazart
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 8.989

7.  Sex differences in the representation of call stimuli in a songbird secondary auditory area.

Authors:  Nicolas Giret; Fabien Menardy; Catherine Del Negro
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 3.558

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.