Literature DB >> 11702919

The level of accuracy and agreement in measures of FEO2, FECO2 and VE between the Cosmed K4b2 portable, respiratory gas analysis system and a metabolic cart.

H C Pinnington1, P Wong, J Tay, D Green, B Dawson.   

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the accuracy of the Cosmed K4b2 (Cosmed, Italy) portable metabolic system that measures FEO2, FECO2 and VE on a breath by breath basis. For gas concentration comparisons, expired air from 20 subjects performing treadmill running was collected in a 600 litre chain compensated Collins Tissot tank and analysed for FEO2 and FECO2 using a laboratory metabolic cart and the Cosmed K4 b2 metabolic system. For ventilation comparisons, serial steady state VE (STPD) values were measured on 10 subjects using the Cosmed K4b2 ventilation turbine and a Morgan ventilation monitor during a continuous treadmill running protocol at ascending speeds of 8, 11 and 14 km x h(-1). The Cosmed K4b2 FEO2 and FECO2 measures were significantly lower (P < 0.001) than the metabolic cart values. Pearson correlation coefficients (r) and the standard error of measurement (SEM) demonstrated a high association between the Cosmed and the metabolic cart measures (FEO2 r =0 .971, SEM 0.071: FECO2 r = 0.925, SEM 0.087). Cosmed VE (l x min(-1)) measures were significantly greater than Morgan values at running speeds of 8 kmh(-1) (P < 0.001) and 11 kmh(-1) (P < 0.001) but not significantly different at 14 km x h(-1) (P > 0.05). When VE measures at the three running speeds were combined, the mean difference between instrument measures ranged between 3.5 - 4.0 l x min(-1) but the values were highly correlated (r= 0.982, P<0.01; SEM 3.03). Linear regression analysis revealed the following regression equations to predict metabolic cart values from Cosmed measures: FEO2 = 0.852+0.963 Cosmed (R2 = 0.940, P<0.00 1), FECO2 = 0.627+0.878 Cosmed (R2=0.856, P<0.001), VE = -2.50+0.984 Cosmed (R2 = 0.965. P < 0.001). The results indicated that the Cosmed K4b2 unit assessed here produced measures of FEO2, FECO2 and VE that had strong correlation to values obtained from a metabolic cart. However, linear regression analysis may further improve the accuracy of Cosmed K4b2 measures when compared to metabolic cart values.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11702919     DOI: 10.1016/s1440-2440(01)80041-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sci Med Sport        ISSN: 1878-1861            Impact factor:   4.319


  17 in total

1.  Kinematical changes in swimming front Crawl and Breaststroke with the AquaTrainer snorkel.

Authors:  Tiago Barbosa; António José Silva; António Malvas Reis; Mário Costa; Nuno Garrido; Fernando Policarpo; Victor Machado Reis
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Accelerometer output and its association with energy expenditure during manual wheelchair propulsion.

Authors:  Y C Learmonth; D Kinnett-Hopkins; I M Rice; J L Dysterheft; R W Motl
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 2.772

Review 3.  The case for driver science in motorsport: a review and recommendations.

Authors:  Edward S Potkanowicz; Ronald W Mendel
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Using Smartphone Sensors for Improving Energy Expenditure Estimation.

Authors:  Amit Pande; Jindan Zhu; Aveek K Das; Yunze Zeng; Prasant Mohapatra; Jay J Han
Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 3.316

Review 5.  Open-circuit respirometry: a historical review of portable gas analysis systems.

Authors:  Duncan J Macfarlane
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Real-world walking economy: can laboratory equations predict field energy expenditure?

Authors:  Peter G Weyand; Lindsay W Ludlow; Jennifer J Nollkamper; Mark J Buller
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2021-08-19

7.  Physical activity energy expenditure measured using a portable telemetric device in comparison with a mass spectrometer.

Authors:  C Maiolo; G Melchiorri; L Iacopino; S Masala; A De Lorenzo
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 13.800

8.  Comparison of the Cosmed K4b(2) portable metabolic system in measuring steady-state walking energy expenditure.

Authors:  Jennifer A Schrack; Eleanor M Simonsick; Luigi Ferrucci
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Reliability and validity of the six-minute arm test for the evaluation of cardiovascular fitness in people with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Adrienne T Hol; Janice J Eng; William C Miller; Shannon Sproule; Andrei V Krassioukov
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.966

10.  Test-retest reliability and minimum detectable change using the K4b2: oxygen consumption, gait efficiency, and heart rate for healthy adults during submaximal walking.

Authors:  Benjamin J Darter; Kelly M Rodriguez; Jason M Wilken
Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.