Literature DB >> 11700794

A comparison of the use of an ATP-based bioluminescent assay and image analysis for the assessment of bacterial adhesion to standard HEMA and biomimetic soft contact lenses.

C S Andrews1, S P Denyer, B Hall, G W Hanlon, A W Lloyd.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate in vitro adhesion of clinically relevant bacteria to standard HEMA and novel biomimetic soft contact lenses (SCL) using bioluminescent ATP assay and image analysis. Unworn SCL were incubated with Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus epidermidis or Serratia marcescens suspended in sterile phosphate buffered saline (PBS). The level of bacterial adhesion after 1, 2, 4, 6 and 18h, was assessed using both image analysis and a bioluminescent ATP assay. Species differences in the overall level of adhesion to the different types of lens were observed using both measurement techniques. Generally bacterial adhesion was shown to peak at 4-6 h, then decline to a much lower level by 18 h. After 4 h, adhesion of all species of bacteria to the biomimetic SCL (omafilcon A) was found to be significantly lower than to the standard HEMA SCL (polymacon) (p<0.05. Student's t-test, n = 4). Both these techniques demonstrated that novel biomimetic SCL materials exhibit significantly lower bacterial adhesion in vitro compared to standard HEMA SCL materials. SCL manufactured with these novel biomimetic materials may reduce the risk of infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11700794     DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(01)00160-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  8 in total

1.  Bacterial adhesion to phosphorylcholine-based polymers with varying cationic charge and the effect of heparin pre-adsorption.

Authors:  S F Rose; S Okere; G W Hanlon; A W Lloyd; A L Lewis
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Influence of Surface Properties on the Adhesion of Staphylococcus epidermidis to Acrylic and Silicone.

Authors:  Cláudia Sousa; Pilar Teixeira; Rosário Oliveira
Journal:  Int J Biomater       Date:  2009-01-25

3.  A three-phase in-vitro system for studying Pseudomonas aeruginosa adhesion and biofilm formation upon hydrogel contact lenses.

Authors:  Claudia Rändler; Rutger Matthes; Andrew J McBain; Bernd Giese; Martin Fraunholz; Rabea Sietmann; Thomas Kohlmann; Nils-Olaf Hübner; Axel Kramer
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 3.605

4.  Increased resistance of contact lens-related bacterial biofilms to antimicrobial activity of soft contact lens care solutions.

Authors:  Loretta B Szczotka-Flynn; Yoshifumi Imamura; Jyotsna Chandra; Changping Yu; Pranab K Mukherjee; Eric Pearlman; Mahmoud A Ghannoum
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.651

Review 5.  Factors influencing bacterial adhesion to contact lenses.

Authors:  Debarun Dutta; Nerida Cole; Mark Willcox
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2012-01-08       Impact factor: 2.367

6.  Impact of wall shear stress on initial bacterial adhesion in rotating annular reactor.

Authors:  Thibaut Saur; Emilie Morin; Frédéric Habouzit; Nicolas Bernet; Renaud Escudié
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Review of Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections and In Vitro Urinary Tract Models.

Authors:  Yvonne J Cortese; Victoria E Wagner; Morgan Tierney; Declan Devine; Andrew Fogarty
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2018-10-14       Impact factor: 2.682

8.  A laboratory assessment of factors that affect bacterial adhesion to contact lenses.

Authors:  Debarun Dutta; Mark Dp Willcox
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2013-11-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.