Literature DB >> 11700786

Using health outcomes data to inform decision-making: a pharmaceutical industry perspective.

M Keech1.   

Abstract

Within the pharmaceutical industry, there is increasing interest in collecting health outcomes data in order to inform decision-making, both internally and externally. The overall aim of generating the health outcomes information is to determine the value of the product, from the perspective of all the stakeholders. In addition to studies carried out during phase II and III of clinical development, pharmaceutical companies have recently begun to collect health outcomes information earlier, with the expected requirements for reimbursement and market access considered during the preclinical and phase I stages. However, there are a number of challenges to the demonstration of product value during drug development, particularly relating to the limitations of clinical trials. One way that pharmaceutical companies are addressing these challenges is through the use of economic modelling, to provide a framework to test assumptions and assess uncertainty, and examine the budget impact of treatments. Although different countries may use the information differently, health outcomes evidence generated by the pharmaceutical industry is generally used to inform decision-making about pricing, reimbursement, treatment guidelines and inclusion of drugs on formularies. A wide variety of health outcomes information is produced by the industry in order to provide data on product value that are appropriate for the different perspectives of the stakeholders in the healthcare system.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11700786     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-200119002-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  8 in total

1.  How well do doctors and nurses work together?

Authors:  C Davies
Journal:  Nurs Times       Date:  1999 Aug 18-24

2.  Emerging role of pharmacoeconomics in the research and development decision-making process.

Authors:  J A DiMasi; E Caglarcan; M Wood-Armany
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Pharmacoeconomics in the new millennium. A pharmaceutical industry perspective.

Authors:  R Thwaites; R J Townsend
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Evaluation of impairment of health related quality of life in asthma: development of a questionnaire for use in clinical trials.

Authors:  E F Juniper; G H Guyatt; R S Epstein; P J Ferrie; R Jaeschke; T K Hiller
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 9.139

5.  Early warning of new health care technologies in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  A Stevens; C Packer; G Robert
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.188

Review 6.  The clinical-economic trial: promise, problems, and challenges.

Authors:  N R Powe; R I Griffiths
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1995-12

7.  The burden of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: data from The Netherlands.

Authors:  M P Rutten van-Mölken; T L Feenstra
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  Measuring quality of life in asthma.

Authors:  E F Juniper; G H Guyatt; P J Ferrie; L E Griffith
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1993-04
  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Cost-analysis of XELOX and FOLFOX4 for treatment of colorectal cancer to assist decision-making on reimbursement.

Authors:  Vicki C Tse; Wai Tong Ng; Victor Lee; Anne W M Lee; Daniel T T Chua; June Chau; Sarah M McGhee
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2011-07-09       Impact factor: 4.430

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.