Literature DB >> 11699305

[The status of therapy of acromioclavicular joint injury. Results of a survey of trauma surgery clinics in Germany].

H Bäthis1, M Tingart, B Bouillon, T Tiling.   

Abstract

The therapy of acromioclavicular dislocations remains controversial. In particular, for injuries classified as Rockwood/Tossy Type III good results have been reported with different operative techniques as well as with conservative treatment. The objective of this study was to obtain data about the current treatment for Rockwood/Tossy III injuries in German trauma departments. In a countrywide anonymous survey 210 German trauma departments were asked about their diagnostic procedures and their treatment strategies for acromioclavicular injuries. 104 questionnaires (49%) were returned and evaluated. In Rockwood/Tossy I/II injuries most clinics recommend conservative treatment (Rockwood/Tossy I/II: 99%/87%). On the other hand, 84% of the clinics would operate on Type III acromioclavicular injuries--especially in athletes or overhead workers. Although 38 percent of the clinics believe that conservative treatment is equal or better than operative treatment, only 13 percent manage Type III injuries conservatively. For more severe acromioclavicular injuries (Rockwood IV to VI) all clinics recommend an operative treatment. The operative techniques of choice for acromioclavicular injuries are K-wire fixation (37%) or a coraco-clavicular cerclage (32%). Of the latter, 73% use a resorbable material, while the remainder use wires.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11699305     DOI: 10.1007/s001130170036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Unfallchirurg        ISSN: 0177-5537            Impact factor:   1.000


  7 in total

1.  Current state of treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint injuries in Germany: is there a difference between specialists and non-specialists? A survey of German trauma and orthopaedic departments.

Authors:  Maurice Balke; Marco M Schneider; Sven Shafizadeh; Holger Bäthis; Bertil Bouillon; Marc Banerjee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  [Acute acromioclavicular joint injuries. Changes in diagnosis and therapy over the last 10 years].

Authors:  M Balke; M M Schneider; R Akoto; H Bäthis; B Bouillon; M Banerjee
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  [Arthroscopically assisted stabilization of acute injury to the acromioclavicular joint with the double TightRope™ technique: one-year results].

Authors:  C Gerhardt; N Kraus; S Pauly; M Scheibel
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  [Arthroscopically assisted reduction of acute acromioclavicular joint separations: comparison of clinical and radiological results of single versus double TightRope™ technique].

Authors:  T Patzer; C Clauss; C A Kühne; E Ziring; T Efe; S Ruchholtz; D Mann
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  The Effects of Hook Plates on the Subacromial Space. A Clinical and MRI Study.

Authors:  Jörg Schmidt; Thorsten Altmann; Ina Schmidt; Jörg Hackenberger; Rainer Letsch
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2008-07-22       Impact factor: 3.693

6.  A combined technique for acromioclavicular reconstruction after acute dislocation - technical description and functional outcomes.

Authors:  Diogo Lino Moura; Augusto Reis E Reis; João Ferreira; Manuel Capelão; José Braz Cardoso
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2017-03-23

7.  Mid-term outcome comparing temporary K-wire fixation versus PDS augmentation of Rockwood grade III acromioclavicular joint separations.

Authors:  Bernd A Leidel; Volker Braunstein; Susann Pilotto; Wolf Mutschler; Chlodwig Kirchhoff
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2009-05-09
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.