Literature DB >> 11697929

Regional differences in the refractory period of the hemodynamic response: an event-related fMRI study.

S A Huettel1, G McCarthy.   

Abstract

We investigated the characteristics of the hemodynamic response (HDR) to paired presentations of visual face stimuli using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Photographs of faces were presented singly or in pairs with either a 1-s or 6-s intrapair interval (IPI). Each trial (single face or face pairs) was followed by an intertrial interval of 16-20 s. Faces were presented at fixation and passively viewed by the 10 subjects. Images were acquired at 1.5 Tesla using a gradient-echo echo-planar imaging sequence sensitive to blood-oxygenation-level-dependent (BOLD) contrast. To examine the refractory properties of the HDR, we subtracted the single-stimulus hemodynamic response from the composite response evoked by face pairs for all voxels significantly active on single face trials. The residual represents the contribution of the second stimulus to the fMRI signal. Event-related presentation of faces evoked activity in medial calcarine cortex and the fusiform gyrus bilaterally. In both calcarine and fusiform regions, the hemodynamic response to the second face in a pair was of lower amplitude and of increased latency at 1 s IPI, with significant recovery of both amplitude and latency toward single-stimulus values at 6 s IPI. At 1 s IPI, significantly greater recovery was found in posterior fusiform regions (50-60%) than in midfusiform regions (10-40%). These regional differences were not apparent at 6 s IPI. No differences were found across slices in calcarine cortex. There was a significant difference in mean latency to HDR peak between calcarine and fusiform cortex, with the HDR peaking about 400 ms earlier in calcarine cortex. We conclude that characteristics of the HDR, notably its amplitude, latency, and refractory properties, differ across visual cortical areas. Copyright 2001 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11697929     DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0900

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  27 in total

1.  Understanding neural system dynamics through task modulation and measurement of functional MRI amplitude, latency, and width.

Authors:  P S F Bellgowan; Z S Saad; P A Bandettini
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-01-27       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Stimulus repetition and hemodynamic response refractoriness in event-related fMRI.

Authors:  Chun-Siong Soon; Vinod Venkatraman; Michael W L Chee
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  The effects of methylphenidate on cerebral responses to conflict anticipation and unsigned prediction error in a stop-signal task.

Authors:  Peter Manza; Sien Hu; Jaime S Ide; Olivia M Farr; Sheng Zhang; Hoi-Chung Leung; Chiang-shan R Li
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 4.153

4.  Temporal resolving power of spin echo and gradient echo fMRI at 3T with apparent diffusion coefficient compartmentalization.

Authors:  Justin Hulvershorn; Luke Bloy; Eugene E Gualtieri; Christopher P Redmann; John S Leigh; Mark A Elliott
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Nonlinearities in rapid event-related fMRI explained by stimulus scaling.

Authors:  Genevieve M Heckman; Seth E Bouvier; Valerie A Carr; Erin M Harley; Kristen S Cardinal; Stephen A Engel
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-11-17       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Modeling low-frequency fluctuation and hemodynamic response timecourse in event-related fMRI.

Authors:  Kendrick N Kay; Stephen V David; Ryan J Prenger; Kathleen A Hansen; Jack L Gallant
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 7.  Pitfalls in FMRI.

Authors:  Sven Haller; Andreas J Bartsch
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Input permutation method to detect active voxels in fMRI study.

Authors:  Sang H Lee; Johan Lim; DoHwan Park; Bharat B Biswal; Eva Petkova
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 2.546

9.  Temporal tuning of repetition suppression across the visual cortex.

Authors:  Matthias Fritsche; Samuel J D Lawrence; Floris P de Lange
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Linear constraint minimum variance beamformer functional magnetic resonance inverse imaging.

Authors:  Fa-Hsuan Lin; Thomas Witzel; Thomas A Zeffiro; John W Belliveau
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.