Literature DB >> 11697923

Molecular phylogeny of the Australian frog genera Crinia, Geocrinia, and allied taxa (Anura: Myobatrachidae).

K Read1, J S Keogh, I A Scott, J D Roberts, P Doughty.   

Abstract

We present a mitochondrial gene tree for representative species of all the genera in the subfamily Myobatrachinae, with special emphasis on Crinia and Geocrinia. This group has been the subject of a number of long-standing taxonomic and phylogenetic debates. Our phylogeny is based on data from approximately 780 bp of 12S rRNA and 676 bp of ND2, and resolves a number of these problems. We confirm that the morphologically highly derived monotypic genera Metacrinia, Myobatrachus, and Arenophryne are closely related, and that Pseudophryne forms the sister group to these genera. Uperoleia and the recently described genus Spicospina are also part of this clade. Our data show that Assa and Geocrinia are reciprocally monophyletic and together they form a well-supported clade. Geocrinia is monophyletic and the phylogenetic relationships with the genus are fully resolved with two major species groups identified: G. leai, G. victoriana, and G. laevis; and G. rosea, G. alba, and G. vitellina (we were unable to sample G. lutea). We confirm that Taudactylus forms the sister group to the other myobatrachine genera, but our data are equivocal on the phylogenetic position of Paracrinia. The phylogenetic relationships among Crinia species are well resolved with strong support for a number of distinct monophyletic clades, but more data are required to resolve relationships among these major Crinia clades. Crinia tasmaniensis and Bryobatrachus nimbus form the sister clade to the rest of Crinia. Due to the lack of generic level synapomorphies for a Bryobatrachus that includes C. tasmaniensis, we synonymize Bryobatrachus with Crinia. Crinia georgiana does not form a clade distinct from other Crinia species and so our data do not support recognition of the genus Ranidella for other Crinia species. Crinia subinsignifera, C. pseudinsignifera, and C. insignifera are extremely closely related despite differences in male advertisement call. A preliminary investigation of phylogeographic substructure within C. signifera revealed significant divergence between samples from across the range of this species. Copyright 2001 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11697923     DOI: 10.1006/mpev.2001.1014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol        ISSN: 1055-7903            Impact factor:   4.286


  8 in total

1.  The evolution of parental care and egg size: a comparative analysis in frogs.

Authors:  Kyle Summers; Christian Sea McKeon; Heather Heying
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Independent Transitions between Monsoonal and Arid Biomes Revealed by Systematic Revison of a Complex of Australian Geckos (Diplodactylus; Diplodactylidae).

Authors:  Paul M Oliver; Patrick J Couper; Mitzy Pepper
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Evolutionary diversification of the lizard genus Bassiana (Scincidae) across Southern Australia.

Authors:  Sylvain Dubey; Richard Shine
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Water relations of the burrowing sandhill frog, Arenophryne rotunda (Myobatrachidae).

Authors:  V A Cartledge; P C Withers; G G Thompson; K A McMaster
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2005-11-29       Impact factor: 2.230

5.  Evolution and plasticity of anuran larval development in response to desiccation. A comparative analysis.

Authors:  Alex Richter-Boix; Miguel Tejedo; Enrico L Rezende
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Evolutionary and natural history of the turtle frog, Myobatrachus gouldii, a bizarre myobatrachid frog in the southwestern Australian biodiversity hotspot.

Authors:  Samantha Vertucci; Mitzy Pepper; Danielle L Edwards; J Dale Roberts; Nicola Mitchell; J Scott Keogh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A test for plasticity in sperm motility activation in response to osmotic environment in an anuran amphibian.

Authors:  Phillip G Byrne; Zara M Anastas; Aimee J Silla
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 3.167

8.  Understanding of the impact of chemicals on amphibians: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Andrés Egea-Serrano; Rick A Relyea; Miguel Tejedo; Mar Torralva
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.912

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.