Literature DB >> 11697755

Bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of lorazepam after intranasal, intravenous, and intramuscular administration.

D P Wermeling1, J L Miller, S M Archer, J M Manaligod, A C Rudy.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic profile of intranasal lorazepam in comparison to currently established administration routes. Eleven healthy volunteers completed this randomized crossover study. On three occasions, each separated by a 1-week washout, subjects received a 2 mg dose of lorazepam via the intranasal, intravenous, or intramuscular route. Blood samples were collected serially from 0 to 36 hours. Noncompartmental methods were used to determine pharmacokinetic parameters. Lorazepam was well absorbed following intranasal administration with a mean (%CV) bioavailability of 77.7(11.1). Intranasal administration resulted in a faster absorption rate than intramuscular administration. Elimination profiles were comparable between all three routes. The concentration-time profile for intranasal delivery demonstrated evidence of a double peak in several subjects, suggesting partial oral absorption. Females were found to have significantly higher AUC values than males for all three delivery routes. Overall, this study demonstrated favorable pharmacokinetics of intranasal lorazepam in relation to standard administration methods. Intranasal delivery could provide an alternative, noninvasive delivery route for lorazepam.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11697755     DOI: 10.1177/00912700122012779

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0091-2700            Impact factor:   3.126


  20 in total

1.  Buccal and intranasal lorazepam clinical pharmacokinetics: can it adequately compete with intravenous lorazepam in pediatric care patients?

Authors:  Nuggehally R Srinivas
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Pharmacokinetic evaluation of intranasally administered vinyl polymer-coated lorazepam microparticles in rabbits.

Authors:  Yanjun Zhao; Marc B Brown; Rajeshree H Khengar; Matthew J Traynor; Pedro Barata; Stuart A Jones
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 3.  Treatment of patients with cocaine-induced arrhythmias: bringing the bench to the bedside.

Authors:  Robert S Hoffman
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Pharmacokinetics of buccal and intranasal lorazepam in healthy adult volunteers.

Authors:  Mark Anderson; Parag Tambe; Helen Sammons; Hussain Mulla; Richard Cole; Imti Choonara
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Comparison of the behavioral and cardiovascular effects of intranasal and oral d-amphetamine in healthy human subjects.

Authors:  Joshua A Lile; Shanna Babalonis; Cleeve Emurian; Catherine A Martin; Daniel P Wermeling; Thomas H Kelly
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 3.126

Review 6.  A Common Reference-Based Indirect Comparison Meta-Analysis of Buccal versus Intranasal Midazolam for Early Status Epilepticus.

Authors:  Francesco Brigo; Raffaele Nardone; Frediano Tezzon; Eugen Trinka
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 5.749

7.  Pharmacokinetics of intravenous lorazepam in pediatric patients with and without status epilepticus.

Authors:  James M Chamberlain; Edmund V Capparelli; Kathleen M Brown; Cheryl W Vance; Kathleen Lillis; Prashant Mahajan; Richard Lichenstein; Rachel M Stanley; Colleen O Davis; Stephen Gordon; Jill M Baren; John N van den Anker
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 4.406

Review 8.  Treatment of Generalized Convulsive Status Epilepticus in Pediatric Patients.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Alford; James W Wheless; Stephanie J Phelps
Journal:  J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug

Review 9.  New Non-Intravenous Routes for Benzodiazepines in Epilepsy: A Clinician Perspective.

Authors:  Marco Mula
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 5.749

10.  A workflow example of PBPK modeling to support pediatric research and development: case study with lorazepam.

Authors:  A R Maharaj; J S Barrett; A N Edginton
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 4.009

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.