Literature DB >> 11697557

Do guidelines matter? A population-based study of diabetes drug use during 20 years.

J Stålhammar1, C Berne, K Svärdsudd.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyse diabetes drug use in a defined population during 20 years in relation to recommendations in published guidelines.
DESIGN: From the Tierp Study Database, all medical records for diabetes patients at the primary health care centre in Tierp municipality and all prescriptions for diabetes drugs at the local pharmacies during the period 1975-1994 were collected. Data for 2125 persons were obtained, generating 13,190 person-years of observation.
SETTING: Tierp primary health care district. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Diabetes treatment.
RESULTS: The annual prevalence of diabetes mellitus increased from 2.8% (565 patients) to 3.8% (734 patients). When guidelines emphasised diet treatment, treatment with diet only increased and oral pharmacological treatment decreased. When guidelines emphasised better glycaemic control, diet only decreased and biguanide treatment increased, and when guidelines emphasised vigorous glycaemic control, treatment with diet only decreased further and sulphonylurea and insulin use increased. The substantial age and sex differences in antidiabetic drug use at the beginning of the period were partly reduced over time.
CONCLUSIONS: The considerable changes in antidiabetic drug use during the study period coincided with changes in the guidelines issued. The age and sex differences in drug use became less pronounced towards the end of the period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11697557     DOI: 10.1080/028134301316982388

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care        ISSN: 0281-3432            Impact factor:   2.581


  4 in total

1.  The impact of new insights and revised practice guidelines on prescribing drugs in the treatment of Type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  René Lub; Petra Denig; Paul B van den Berg; Klaas Hoogenberg; Lolkje T W de Jong-van den Berg
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-06-23       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  The influence of non-response in a population-based cohort study on type 2 diabetes evaluated by the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register.

Authors:  Anna-Karin Eriksson; Anders Ekbom; Agneta Hilding; Claes-Göran Ostenson
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  Temporal trends in the use of antidiabetic medicines: a nationwide 9-year study in older people living in New Zealand.

Authors:  Prasad S Nishtala; Mohammed Saji Salahudeen
Journal:  Ther Adv Drug Saf       Date:  2016-07-21

4.  The effect of guideline revisions on vascular complications of type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Ralph Heijmans; Sunny S Singh; Aloysius G Lieverse; Eric J G Sijbrands; Mandy van Hoek
Journal:  Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 3.565

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.