Literature DB >> 11697010

Group mentoring to foster the responsible conduct of research.

C Whitbeck1.   

Abstract

This article reports on a method of group mentoring to strengthen responsible research conduct. A key feature of this approach is joint exploration of the issues by trainees and their faculty research supervisors. These interactions not only help participants learn about current ethical norms for research practice, but also draw on the accumulated experience of faculty and staff about practical problems of research conduct, and help to make faculty more articulate about responsible research conduct and so better able to guide their trainees. By working with departments or laboratories as a whole the method facilitates the formulation of specific norms appropriate to particular research situations and to strengthen the group's ability to support appropriate behavior and deal with new issues as they arise. It also gives students more ways to ask questions about research practice and to benefit from the experience of all members of their department or group as well as their own research supervisors. The method is well tested and has been well received by a wide variety of departments and research groups. It provides the means for a constructive and enjoyable response to the Public Health Service's (PHS) new Policy on Instruction in the Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) that requires education in the responsible conduct of research for all those funded by PHS funds, including faculty and staff as well as trainees.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioethics and Professional Ethics; Biomedical and Behavioral Research

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11697010     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-001-0012-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  2 in total

1.  Fallacies in moral philosophy.

Authors:  S HAMPSHIRE
Journal:  Mind       Date:  1949-10

2.  Scientists and the integrity of research.

Authors:  B Alberts; K Shine
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-12-09       Impact factor: 47.728

  2 in total
  10 in total

1.  Trustworthy research. Commentary on 'Group mentoring to foster the responsible conduct of research'. (Whitbeck).

Authors:  P Woolf
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Mentoring for Responsible Research: The Creation of a Curriculum for Faculty to Teach RCR in the Research Environment.

Authors:  Dena K Plemmons; Michael W Kalichman
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Ethics in 15 min per week.

Authors:  Ann M Peiffer; Christina E Hugenschmidt; Paul J Laurienti
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2010-03-07       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Rescuing responsible conduct of research (RCR) education.

Authors:  Michael Kalichman
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.622

5.  Intervention to Promote Responsible Conduct of Research Mentoring.

Authors:  Michael W Kalichman; Dena K Plemmons
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 3.525

6.  A Modest Proposal to Move RCR Education Out of the Classroom and into Research.

Authors:  Michael Kalichman
Journal:  J Microbiol Biol Educ       Date:  2014-12-15

7.  Researchers' perceptions of research misbehaviours: a mixed methods study among academic researchers in Amsterdam.

Authors:  Tamarinde L Haven; Joeri K Tijdink; H Roeline Pasman; Guy Widdershoven; Gerben Ter Riet; Lex M Bouter
Journal:  Res Integr Peer Rev       Date:  2019-12-02

8.  A randomized trial of a lab-embedded discourse intervention to improve research ethics.

Authors:  Dena K Plemmons; Erica N Baranski; Kyle Harp; David D Lo; Courtney K Soderberg; Timothy M Errington; Brian A Nosek; Kevin M Esterling
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Assessment of research ethics education offerings of pharmacy master programs in an Arab nation relative to top programs worldwide: A qualitative content analysis.

Authors:  Wesam S Ahmed; Camille Nebeker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Stakeholders' perspectives on research integrity training practices: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Daniel Pizzolato; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 2.652

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.