Literature DB >> 11697009

Mentoring and the impact of the research climate.

G C Roberts1, M Kavussanu, R L Sprague.   

Abstract

In this article, we focus on the mentoring process, and we argue that the internal and external pressures extant at research universities may create a research culture that may be antithetical to appropriate mentoring. We developed a scale based on motivation theory to determine the perceived research culture in departments and research laboratories, and a mentoring scale to determine approaches to mentoring graduate students. Participants were 610 faculty members across 49 departments at a research oriented university. The findings were that a mastery-oriented research climate and an outcome-oriented research climate were manifested at the university. More importantly, each research climate had its own unique impact on how the faculty approached mentoring graduate students. A mastery research climate was related to a more supportive approach to mentoring than the outcome research climate. We concluded by suggesting that the outcome research climate may have an adverse effect on effective mentoring and on maintaining research ethics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioethics and Professional Ethics; Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11697009     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-001-0010-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  2 in total

1.  Influences on the ethical beliefs of graduate students concerning research.

Authors:  R L Sprague; J Daw; G C Roberts
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Scientists and the integrity of research.

Authors:  B Alberts; K Shine
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-12-09       Impact factor: 47.728

  2 in total
  7 in total

1.  Influences on the ethical beliefs of graduate students concerning research.

Authors:  R L Sprague; J Daw; G C Roberts
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  The university and the responsible conduct of research: who is responsible for what?

Authors:  Katherine Alfredo; Hillary Hart
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Are Leadership and Management Essential for Good Research? An Interview Study of Genetic Researchers.

Authors:  Alison L Antes; Adelina Mart; James M DuBois
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 1.742

4.  Assessing the climate for research ethics in labs: Development and validation of a brief measure.

Authors:  Erin D Solomon; Tammy English; Matthew Wroblewski; James M DuBois; Alison L Antes
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 2.622

5.  Researchers' perceptions of research misbehaviours: a mixed methods study among academic researchers in Amsterdam.

Authors:  Tamarinde L Haven; Joeri K Tijdink; H Roeline Pasman; Guy Widdershoven; Gerben Ter Riet; Lex M Bouter
Journal:  Res Integr Peer Rev       Date:  2019-12-02

6.  Career support in medicine - experiences with a mentoring program for junior physicians at a university hospital.

Authors:  Barbara Buddeberg-Fischer; Esther Vetsch; Guido Mattanza
Journal:  Psychosoc Med       Date:  2004-07-01

7.  Stakeholders' perspectives on research integrity training practices: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Daniel Pizzolato; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 2.652

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.