Literature DB >> 11696783

The use of vesicostomy as permanent urinary diversion in the child with myelomeningocele.

J C Hutcheson1, C S Cooper, D A Canning, S A Zderic, H M Snyder.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Treatment of the child with myelomeningocele presents the urologist with many challenges. While vesicostomies are usually used for temporary bladder drainage until continent reconstruction is performed, we have a population of postpubertal patients with myelomeningocele in whom vesicostomies have been preserved. We review our experience with these older children.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A search of our database of 350 patients with myelodysplasia identified 23 with urinary diversion accomplished by permanent vesicostomy. Those who had undergone vesicostomy after age 11 years were designated as group 1. Those who received a vesicostomy early in life that was maintained post puberty were designated as group 2. Indications for vesicostomy, upper tract status before and after vesicostomy, recurrent infections and complications were noted. Upper tract status was determined by serial ultrasounds during routine followup.
RESULTS: Group 1 was comprised of 5 patients with mean age at vesicostomy of 17 years and a mean followup interval of 5.2 years. Group 2 was comprised of 18 patients with mean age of vesicostomy at 2.6 years and mean followup interval of 13 years. Hydronephrosis resolved in all children from both groups. Vesicostomy revision was required in 1 patient secondary to prolapse. Other complications included mild prolapse that did not require revision, stenosis requiring revision 5 months after the initial procedure and an early bilateral ureterovesical obstruction that resolved. Of the patients 33% had recurrent upper tract calculi.
CONCLUSIONS: While the goal of achieving urinary continence is well worth striving for in the child with myelomeningocele, it is not realistic for all patients. We believe that permanent cutaneous vesicostomy is an acceptable alternative that the reconstructive surgeon should consider. This reliable and simple technique ensures safe decompression of the upper urinary tracts, while avoiding the complications of urinary diversion using segments of bowel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11696783

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  7 in total

Review 1.  Current approaches to the urologic care of children with spina bifida.

Authors:  David B Joseph
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Differences in continence rates in individuals with spina bifida based on ethnicity.

Authors:  Kathryn A Smith; Tiebin Liu; Kurt A Freeman; Cecily Betz; Gerald H Clayton; Heidi Castillo; Jonathan Castillo; Duong Tu; Alexander Van Speybroeck; William O Walker
Journal:  J Pediatr Rehabil Med       Date:  2019

3.  Intermittent voiding per urethra as an indicator of cutaneous vesicostomy malfunction.

Authors:  Asal Hojjat; Abdol-Mohammad Kajbafzadeh; Alireza Sina; Tina Mazaheri; Mona Vahidi Rad; Behtash Ghazi Nezami; Payam Mohammadinejad
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Struvite urolithiasis and chronic urinary tract infection in a murine model of urinary diversion.

Authors:  Brian Becknell; Ashley R Carpenter; Brad Bolon; John R Asplin; Susan E Ingraham; David S Hains; Andrew L Schwaderer; Kirk M McHugh
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 5.  The urological management of children with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Jairam R Eswara; Miguel Castellan; Ricardo González; Nicolas Mendieta; Marc Cendron
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Is Vesicostomy Still a Contemporary Method of Managing Posterior Urethral Valves?

Authors:  Aybike Hofmann; Maximilian Haider; Alexander Cox; Franziska Vauth; Wolfgang H Rösch
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-21

7.  Protective temporary vesicostomy for upper urinary tract problems in children: a five-year experience.

Authors:  Mohsen Rouzrokh; Alireza Mirshemirani; Ahmad Khaleghnejad-Tabari; Naser Sadeghian; Leily Mohajerzadeh; Maesomeh Mohkam
Journal:  Iran J Pediatr       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 0.364

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.