Literature DB >> 11696720

The diagnostic value of bone scan in patients with renal cell carcinoma.

S Koga1, S Tsuda, M Nishikido, Y Ogawa, K Hayashi, T Hayashi, H Kanetake.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Bone scan is performed as part of the evaluation of bone metastasis. We assessed the diagnostic value of bone scan in patients with renal cell carcinoma.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Bone scan was performed at presentation in 205 patients with confirmed renal cell carcinoma. Abnormal hot areas were further evaluated by x-ray, computerized tomography or surgery.
RESULTS: Of the 56 patients (27%) with an abnormal bone scan 32 (57%) had osseous metastatic lesions. Overall bone metastasis was present in 34 of the 205 patients (17%). Bone scan had 94% sensitivity and 86% specificity. Of the 124 patients with clinically localized, stages T1-2N0M0 disease exclusive of bone metastasis 6 (5%) had bone metastasis only, whereas 28 of 81 (35%) with locally advanced or metastatic disease had bone metastasis, including 12 (35%) who complained of bone pain and 19 (56%) who presented with other symptoms due to local tumor growth or metastasis at other sites. Three patients (9%) were asymptomatic. There was osseous metastasis without other metastasis, enlarged regional lymph nodes or bone pain in 7 patients, including 1 with stage T1b (2% of all with that stage), 2 with stage T2 (5%), 1 with stage T3a (4%), 1 with stage T3b (6%), 1 with stage T3c (14%) and 1 with stage T4 (6%) disease.
CONCLUSIONS: Bone scan may be omitted in patients with stages T1-3aN0M0 tumors and no bone pain because of the low proportion of missed cases with bone metastasis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11696720

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  8 in total

1.  Bone metastases affect prognosis but not effectiveness of third-line targeted therapies in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Roberto Iacovelli; Daniele Santini; Mimma Rizzo; Alessandra Felici; Matteo Santoni; Elena Verzoni; Cristina Masini; Francesco Massari; Nicola Calvani; Alessandra Mosca; Giuseppe Procopio
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 2.  Diagnosis of bone metastases: a meta-analysis comparing ¹⁸FDG PET, CT, MRI and bone scintigraphy.

Authors:  Hui-Lin Yang; Tao Liu; Xi-Ming Wang; Yong Xu; Sheng-Ming Deng
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Imaging for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Soumya V L Vig; Elcin Zan; Stella K Kang
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 2.241

4.  Elevated plasma osteopontin as marker for distant metastases and poor survival in patients with renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Azizbek Ramankulov; Michael Lein; Glen Kristiansen; Hellmuth-A Meyer; Stefan A Loening; Klaus Jung
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 4.553

5.  [The value of imaging techniques for bone metastases].

Authors:  C Kratochwil
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 0.639

6.  Utility of hybrid SPECT-CT in the detection of unsuspected single lytic vertebral metastases in renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Cnb Harisankar; Bhagwant Rai Mittal; Anish Bhattacharya; Baljinder Singh
Journal:  Indian J Nucl Med       Date:  2010-01

7.  SEOM clinical guideline for treatment of kidney cancer (2017).

Authors:  E Gallardo; M J Méndez-Vidal; J L Pérez-Gracia; J M Sepúlveda-Sánchez; M Campayo; I Chirivella-González; X García-Del-Muro; A González-Del-Alba; E Grande; C Suárez
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 3.405

8.  Metastatic Lesion of the Tibia from Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Piotr Młodożeniec; Krzysztof Balawender; Mateusz Zasadny
Journal:  Case Rep Oncol Med       Date:  2021-07-30
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.