Literature DB >> 11695547

Xpa and Xpa/p53+/- knockout mice: overview of available data.

C F van Kreijl1, P A McAnulty, R B Beems, A Vynckier, H van Steeg, R Fransson-Steen, C L Alden, R Forster, J W van der Laan, J Vandenberghe.   

Abstract

DNA repair deficient Xpa-/- and Xpa-/-/p53+/- knock-out mice in a C57BL/6 genetic background, referred to as respectively the XPA and XPA/p53 model, were investigated in the international collaborative research program coordinated by International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI)/Health and Environmental Science Institute. From the selected list of 21 ILSI compounds, 13 were tested in the XPA model, and 10 in the XPA/p53 model. With one exception, all studies had a duration of 9 months (39 weeks). The observed spontaneous tumor incidence for the XPA model after 9 months was comparable to that of wild-type mice (total 6%). For the XPA/p53 model, this was somewhat higher (9%/13% for males/females). The 3 positive control compounds used, B[a]P, p-cresidine, and 2-AAF, gave positive and consistent tumor responses in both the XPA and XPA/p53 model, but no or lower responses in wild-type mice. From the 13 ILSI compounds tested, the single genotoxic carcinogen (phenacetin) was negative in both the XPA and XPA/p53 model. Positive tumor responses were observed for 4 compounds, the immunosuppressant cyclosporin A, the hormone carcinogens DES and estradiol, and the peroxisome proliferator WY-14,643. Negative results were obtained with 5 other nongenotoxic rodent carcinogens, and 2 noncarcinogens tested. As expected, both DNA repair deficient models respond to genotoxic carcinogens. Combined with previous results, 6 out of 7 (86%) of the genotoxic human and/or rodent carcinogens tested are positive in the XPA model. The positive results obtained with the 4 mentioned nongenotoxic ILSI compounds may point to other carcinogenic mechanisms involved, or may raise some doubts about their true nongenotoxic nature. In general. the XPA/p53 model appears to be more sensitive to carcinogens than the XPA model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11695547     DOI: 10.1080/0192623013014189281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Pathol        ISSN: 0192-6233            Impact factor:   1.930


  8 in total

1.  Power, expertise and the limits of representative democracy: genetics as scientific progress or political legitimation in carcinogenic risk assessment of pharmaceuticals?

Authors:  John Abraham; Rachel Ballinger
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2011-07-20

2.  Phenotype-based identification of mouse chromosome instability mutants.

Authors:  Naoko Shima; Suzanne A Hartford; Ted Duffy; Lawriston A Wilson; Kerry J Schimenti; John C Schimenti
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  DNA repair-deficient Xpa/p53 knockout mice are sensitive to the non-genotoxic carcinogen cyclosporine A: escape of initiated cells from immunosurveillance?

Authors:  Petra C E van Kesteren; Rudolf B Beems; Mirjam Luijten; Joke Robinson; Annemieke de Vries; Harry van Steeg
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2009-01-09       Impact factor: 4.944

Review 4.  The use of genetically modified mice in cancer risk assessment: challenges and limitations.

Authors:  David A Eastmond; Suryanarayana V Vulimiri; John E French; Babasaheb Sonawane
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 5.635

5.  Science, politics, and health in the brave new world of pharmaceutical carcinogenic risk assessment: technical progress or cycle of regulatory capture?

Authors:  John Abraham; Rachel Ballinger
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Transcriptional consequences of XPA disruption in human cell lines.

Authors:  Mandira Manandhar; Megan G Lowery; Karen S Boulware; Kevin H Lin; Yue Lu; Richard D Wood
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2017-06-29

7.  Mutagenicity of the peroxisome proliferators clofibrate, Wyeth 14,643 and di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate in the lacZ plasmid-based transgenic mouse mutation assay.

Authors:  Michaël ETI Boerrigter
Journal:  J Carcinog       Date:  2004-05-05

8.  A toxicogenomic approach for the prediction of murine hepatocarcinogenesis using ensemble feature selection.

Authors:  Johannes Eichner; Nadine Kossler; Clemens Wrzodek; Arno Kalkuhl; Dorthe Bach Toft; Nina Ostenfeldt; Virgile Richard; Andreas Zell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.