Literature DB >> 11695546

DNA repair-deficient Xpa and Xpa/p53+/- knock-out mice: nature of the models.

H van Steeg1, A de Vries, J van Benthem, R B Beems, C F van Kreijl.   

Abstract

Xeroderma pigmentosum (XP) is a rare autosomal recessive disease in which repair of ultraviolet (UV)-induced DNA damage is impaired or is totally absent due to mutations in genes controlling the DNA repair pathway known as nucleotide excision repair (NER). XP is characterized, in part, by extreme sensitivity of the skin to sunlight, and XP patients have a more than 1000-fold increased risk of developing cancer at sun-exposed areas of the skin. To study the role of NER in chemical-induced tumorigenesis in more detail, the authors developed Xpa-/- homozygous knockout mice with a complete defect in NER (designated as Xpa mice or XPA model). Xpa mice develop skin tumors at high frequency when exposed to UV light, and as such, they mimic the phenotype of human XP. Moreover, the Xpa mice also appear to be susceptible to genotoxic carcinogens given orally. Based on these phenotypic characteristics, the Xpa mice were considered to be an attractive candidate mouse model for use in identifying human carcinogens. In an attempt to further increase both the sensitivity and specificity of the XPA model in carcinogenicity testing, the authors crossed Xpa mice with mice having a heterozygous defect in the tumor suppressor gene p53. Xpa/p53+/- double knockout mice develop tumors earlier and with higher incidences upon exposure to carcinogens as compared to their single knockout counterparts. Here the authors describe the development and features of the Xpa mouse and present some examples of the Xpa and Xpa/p53+/- mouse models' sensitivity towards genotoxic carcinogens. It appeared that the Xpa/p53+/- double knockout mouse model is favorable over both the Xpa and p53+/- single knockout models in short-term carcinogenicity testing. In addition to the fact that the double knockout mice respond more robustly to carcinogens, they also appear to respond in a very discriminative way. All compounds identified thus far are true (human) carcinogens, and, therefore, the authors believe that the Xpa/p53+/- mouse model is an excellent candidate for a future replacement of the chronic mouse bioassay, at least for certain classes of chemicals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11695546     DOI: 10.1080/019262301753178519

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Pathol        ISSN: 0192-6233            Impact factor:   1.902


  10 in total

1.  Nuclear bud formation: a novel manifestation of Zidovudine genotoxicity.

Authors:  A Dutra; E Pak; S Wincovitch; K John; M C Poirier; O A Olivero
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 1.636

2.  Exploiting DNA repair defects in triple negative breast cancer to improve cell killing.

Authors:  Kevin J Lee; Elise Mann; Griffin Wright; Cortt G Piett; Zachary D Nagel; Natalie R Gassman
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 8.168

3.  p53 haploinsufficiency profoundly accelerates the onset of tongue tumors in mice lacking the xeroderma pigmentosum group A gene.

Authors:  Fumio Ide; Munenori Kitada; Hideaki Sakashita; Kaoru Kusama; Kiyoji Tanaka; Takatoshi Ishikawa
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.307

4.  DNA repair-deficient Xpa/p53 knockout mice are sensitive to the non-genotoxic carcinogen cyclosporine A: escape of initiated cells from immunosurveillance?

Authors:  Petra C E van Kesteren; Rudolf B Beems; Mirjam Luijten; Joke Robinson; Annemieke de Vries; Harry van Steeg
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2009-01-09       Impact factor: 4.944

Review 5.  The use of genetically modified mice in cancer risk assessment: challenges and limitations.

Authors:  David A Eastmond; Suryanarayana V Vulimiri; John E French; Babasaheb Sonawane
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 5.635

6.  Role of nucleotide excision repair and p53 in zidovudine (AZT)-induced centrosomal deregulation.

Authors:  Dariya Momot; Terri A Nostrand; Kaarthik John; Yvona Ward; Seth M Steinberg; David J Liewehr; Miriam C Poirier; Ofelia A Olivero
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 3.216

7.  TP53 mutations induced by BPDE in Xpa-WT and Xpa-Null human TP53 knock-in (Hupki) mouse embryo fibroblasts.

Authors:  Jill E Kucab; Harry van Steeg; Mirjam Luijten; Heinz H Schmeiser; Paul A White; David H Phillips; Volker M Arlt
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 2.433

8.  DICER- and MMSET-catalyzed H4K20me2 recruits the nucleotide excision repair factor XPA to DNA damage sites.

Authors:  Shalaka Chitale; Holger Richly
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  Association of XPA polymorphism with breast cancer risk: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yunhong Zhang; Qiang Guo; Xunqiang Yin; Xiaoxiao Zhu; Lin Zhao; Zhen Zhang; Ran Wei; Bin Wang; Xia Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  Silibinin enhances the repair of ultraviolet B-induced DNA damage by activating p53-dependent nucleotide excision repair mechanism in human dermal fibroblasts.

Authors:  Ruth Guillermo-Lagae; Gagan Deep; Harold Ting; Chapla Agarwal; Rajesh Agarwal
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-11-24
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.