Literature DB >> 11695501

A new assessment for elders admitted to acute care: reliability of the MDS-AC.

G I Carpenter1, G F Teare, K Steel, K Berg, K Murphy, J Bjornson, P V Jonsson, J P Hirdes.   

Abstract

Assessment of older people rarely includes functional domains critical for ensuring optimum outcome of treatment in acute hospital care. We report the development of a new assessment instrument, and illustrate how differences between pre-hospital and hospital admission status can be systematically evaluated using the Minimum Data Set for Acute Care (MDS-AC). Content was developed by literature review and consultation with professionals working in acute areas. Dual independent assessments were conducted on hospital in-patients in 4 countries. Inter-assessor reliability coefficients were calculated for each item. Kappa was calculated for all binary and multi-level nominal variables. Quadratically weighted Kappa was estimated for all ordinal multi-level variables. Where one level of the variable contained 90% or more of the subjects, total observed agreement is reported. Separate reliability estimates were calculated for pre-hospitalization and inpatient items. Subjects had a mean age of 78. Completion of pre-hospitalization and hospital period assessment (combined) required 20 and 30 minutes. Excluding items for which 90% or more of subjects were classified into a single scoring level, average inter-assessor reliability coefficient for the pre-hospital period items was 0.57 and for in hospital 0.58. Overall exact agreement was 83% for pre-hospitalization assessment items, and 79% for the in-hospital items. The reliability achieved in the highly unstable situation of the acute admission phase is sufficient for use in clinical care and research. Differences in pre-hospital and admission status necessary for case-mix adjusted comparison of outcomes were illustrated. Development of a means for systematically comparing changes in older people during the course of illness is of increasing importance when addressing questions of the appropriate and inappropriate use of medical technology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11695501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aging (Milano)        ISSN: 0394-9532


  9 in total

1.  First-generation versus third-generation comprehensive geriatric assessment instruments in the acute hospital setting: a comparison of the Minimum Geriatric Screening Tools (MGST) and the interRAI Acute Care (interRAI AC).

Authors:  N I H Wellens; M Deschodt; J Flamaing; P Moons; S Boonen; X Boman; C Gosset; J Petermans; K Milisen
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.075

Review 2.  Validity, Reliability and Feasibility of Tools to Identify Frail Older Patients in Inpatient Hospital Care: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  R M J Warnier; E van Rossum; E van Velthuijsen; W J Mulder; J M G A Schols; G I J M Kempen
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.075

3.  Method for Assigning Priority Levels in Acute Care (MAPLe-AC) predicts outcomes of acute hospital care of older persons--a cross-national validation.

Authors:  Anja Noro; Jeffrey W Poss; John P Hirdes; Harriet Finne-Soveri; Gunnar Ljunggren; Jan Björnsson; Marianne Schroll; Palmi V Jonsson
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 2.796

4.  The interRAI Acute Care instrument incorporated in an eHealth system for standardized and web-based geriatric assessment: strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats in the acute hospital setting.

Authors:  Els Devriendt; Nathalie I H Wellens; Johan Flamaing; Anja Declercq; Philip Moons; Steven Boonen; Koen Milisen
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 3.921

5.  Examining the adaptability and validity of interRAI acute care quality indicators in a surgical context.

Authors:  Timothy Wood; Mark Chatfield; Leonard Gray; Nancye Peel; Shannon Freeman; Melinda Martin-Khan
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2022-06-14

6.  Reliability of the interRAI suite of assessment instruments: a 12-country study of an integrated health information system.

Authors:  John P Hirdes; Gunnar Ljunggren; John N Morris; Dinnus H M Frijters; Harriet Finne Soveri; Len Gray; Magnus Björkgren; Reudi Gilgen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-12-30       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 7.  Comparing the functional independence measure and the interRAI/MDS for use in the functional assessment of older adults: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Christine Glenny; Paul Stolee
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2009-11-29       Impact factor: 3.921

Review 8.  Tools that assess functional decline: systematic literature review update.

Authors:  Kate Beaton; Karen Grimmer
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 4.458

9.  Translation and adaption of the interRAI Suite to local requirements in Belgian hospitals.

Authors:  Nathalie I H Wellens; Johan Flamaing; Philip Moons; Mieke Deschodt; Steven Boonen; Koen Milisen
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 3.921

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.