Literature DB >> 11695383

Comparison of serological methods and blood culture for detection of Trypanosoma cruzi infection in raccoons (Procyon lotor).

M J Yabsley1, G P Noblet, O J Pung.   

Abstract

The indirect immunofluorescent antibody test (IFAT) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) were compared with blood culture for the detection of Trypanosoma cruzi infection in 83 raccoons (Procyon lotor) trapped in 4 counties of southeast Georgia. Both IFAT and ELISA detected 24 of 25 culture-positive samples (96% sensitivity). Cultures from 25 raccoons (30%) were positive for epimastigotes, whereas a total of 50 raccoons (60%) was seropositive by either the IFAT or ELISA. Forty-five of 83 serum samples (54%) were positive for anti-T. cruzi antibodies with the ELISA, and 47 were IFAT positive (57%). Forty-two of the 50 seropositive raccoons (84%) were seropositive by both tests. Endpoint titers of IFAT-positive samples were determined by testing doubling dilutions from 1:40 to 1:1280. High titers of 640 and 320 were observed for 4 raccoons trapped in 1 county (St. Catherines Island, Liberty County) and titers of 160 for 1-2 raccoons from each of the 4 counties sampled. IFAT titers and ELISA optical density values were positively correlated. Both serological tests have a high sensitivity and should be excellent tools for studying the prevalence of T. cruzi in wildlife populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11695383     DOI: 10.1645/0022-3395(2001)087[1155:COSMAB]2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Parasitol        ISSN: 0022-3395            Impact factor:   1.276


  9 in total

1.  Seroprevalence of Trypanosoma cruzi among eleven potential reservoir species from six states across the southern United States.

Authors:  Emily L Brown; Dawn M Roellig; Matthew E Gompper; Ryan J Monello; Krista M Wenning; Mourad W Gabriel; Michael J Yabsley
Journal:  Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 2.133

Review 2.  Trypanosoma cruzi and Chagas' Disease in the United States.

Authors:  Caryn Bern; Sonia Kjos; Michael J Yabsley; Susan P Montgomery
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Experimental infection of two South American reservoirs with four distinct strains of Trypanosoma cruzi.

Authors:  Dawn M Roellig; Katherine McMillan; Angela E Ellis; John L Vandeberg; Donald E Champagne; Michael J Yabsley
Journal:  Parasitology       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 3.234

4.  Genetically different isolates of Trypanosoma cruzi elicit different infection dynamics in raccoons (Procyon lotor) and Virginia opossums (Didelphis virginiana).

Authors:  Dawn M Roellig; Angela E Ellis; Michael J Yabsley
Journal:  Int J Parasitol       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 3.981

5.  Estimating contact process saturation in sylvatic transmission of Trypanosoma cruzi in the United States.

Authors:  Christopher Kribs-Zaleta
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2010-04-27

6.  Southern plains woodrats (Neotoma micropus) from southern Texas are important reservoirs of two genotypes of Trypanosoma cruzi and host of a putative novel Trypanosoma species.

Authors:  Roxanne A Charles; Sonia Kjos; Angela E Ellis; John C Barnes; Michael J Yabsley
Journal:  Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 2.133

7.  Evaluation of the Chagas Stat-Pak assay for detection of Trypanosoma cruzi antibodies in wildlife reservoirs.

Authors:  Michael J Yabsley; Emily L Brown; Dawn M Roellig
Journal:  J Parasitol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.276

8.  Trans-sialidase inhibition assay detects Trypanosoma cruzi infection in different wild mammal species.

Authors:  Paula A Sartor; Leonardo A Ceballos; Marcela M Orozco; Marta V Cardinal; Ricardo E Gürtler; María S Leguizamón
Journal:  Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 2.133

9.  Habitat Management to Reduce Human Exposure to Trypanosoma cruzi and Western Conenose Bugs (Triatoma protracta).

Authors:  Lisa Shender; Michael Niemela; Patricia Conrad; Tracey Goldstein; Jonna Mazet
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 3.184

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.