Literature DB >> 11695044

Barium: rationale for a new oral reference dose.

C E Dallas1, P L Williams.   

Abstract

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has an established oral reference dose (RfD) value for Ba of 0.07 mg Ba/kg/d based on a 1984 investigation that reported hypertension. In this study, the toxicological data for Ba has been reevaluated and a revised oral RfD is proposed. The toxicokinetic, acute, and chronic toxicity, carcinogenicity, and reproductive animal studies as well as epidemiological and occupational health human studies for Ba exposure were reviewed for applicability to an oral RfD. The available human studies have some utility but suffer from either a small population size, a short exposure regimen, or difficulties in identifying definitive Ba exposure in the study population. As a result, the available long-term animal studies were found to be more appropriate for the RfD derivation. A dose-response assessment of no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) and lowest-observed-adverse-effect level (LOAEL) values determined that kidney effects are the most sensitive endpoint for adverse health effects related to chronic soluble Ba ingestion in mammals. The most complete animal studies were conducted by the National Toxicology Program (NTP, 1994) and the lowest species NOAELs were 75 mg Ba/kg/d in male mice and 60 mg Ba/kg/d for male rats. The male rats were identified to be the most sensitive population tested and their NOAEL value was selected for extrapolation to an oral RfD. Application of overall uncertainty factors to the lowest NOAEL value from a chronic animal study of either 90 (based on an approach proposed by Dourson, 1994) or the generally accepted 100 results in an oral RfD of 0.66 mg Ba/kg/d or 0.6 mg Ba/kg/d, respectively. It is proposed to use the more conservative value of 0.6 mg Ba/kg/d. This reassessment results in nearly an order of magnitude increase in the U.S. EPA oral RfD for Ba.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11695044     DOI: 10.1080/109374001753146216

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev        ISSN: 1093-7404            Impact factor:   6.393


  12 in total

1.  Hematological, biochemical, and histopathological impacts of barium chloride and barium carbonate accumulation in soft tissues of male Sprague-Dawley rats.

Authors:  Amany Tharwat Mohammed; Hager Tarek H Ismail
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 2.  A review of the health impacts of barium from natural and anthropogenic exposure.

Authors:  Julia Kravchenko; Thomas H Darrah; Richard K Miller; H Kim Lyerly; Avner Vengosh
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 4.609

3.  Regulating in vivo calcification of alginate microbeads.

Authors:  Christopher S D Lee; Hunter R Moyer; Rolando A I Gittens; Joseph K Williams; Adele L Boskey; Barbara D Boyan; Zvi Schwartz
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 12.479

4.  Three-dimensional labeling of newly formed bone using synchrotron radiation barium K-edge subtraction imaging.

Authors:  Arash Panahifar; Treena M Swanston; M Jake Pushie; George Belev; Dean Chapman; Lynn Weber; David M L Cooper
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Barium chloride induces redox status unbalance, upregulates cytokine genes expression and confers hepatotoxicity in rats-alleviation by pomegranate peel.

Authors:  Awatef Elwej; Yousri Grojja; Imen Ghorbel; Ons Boudawara; Raoudha Jarraya; Tahia Boudawara; Najiba Zeghal
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 6.  Environmental barium: potential exposure and health-hazards.

Authors:  Massimiliano Peana; Serenella Medici; Maryam Dadar; Maria Antonietta Zoroddu; Alessio Pelucelli; Christos T Chasapis; Geir Bjørklund
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 5.153

7.  Cytotoxicity screening of 23 engineered nanomaterials using a test matrix of ten cell lines and three different assays.

Authors:  Alexandra Kroll; Christian Dierker; Christina Rommel; Daniela Hahn; Wendel Wohlleben; Christian Schulze-Isfort; Christian Göbbert; Matthias Voetz; Ferdinand Hardinghaus; Jürgen Schnekenburger
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 9.400

8.  The content of selected metals in muscles of the red deer (Cervus elaphus) from Poland.

Authors:  Michał Skibniewski; Ewa M Skibniewska; Tadeusz Kośla
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 4.223

9.  Comparing the metal concentration in the hair of cancer patients and healthy people living in the malwa region of punjab, India.

Authors:  Eleonore Blaurock-Busch; Yvette M Busch; Albrecht Friedle; Holger Buerner; Chander Parkash; Anudeep Kaur
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Oncol       Date:  2014-01-09

10.  Tobacco smoke exposure and levels of urinary metals in the U.S. youth and adult population: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999-2004.

Authors:  Patricia A Richter; Ellen E Bishop; Jiantong Wang; Monica H Swahn
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.