Literature DB >> 11694724

How plastic is spatial hearing?

A J King1, O Kacelnik, T D Mrsic-Flogel, J W Schnupp, C H Parsons, D R Moore.   

Abstract

The location of a sound source is derived by the auditory system from spatial cues present in the signals at the two ears. These cues include interaural timing and level differences, as well as monaural spectral cues generated by the external ear. The values of these cues vary with individual differences in the shape and dimensions of the head and external ears. We have examined the neurophysiological consequences of these intersubject variations by recording the responses of neurons in ferret primary auditory cortex to virtual sound sources mimicking the animal's own ears or those of other ferrets. For most neurons, the structure of the spatial response fields changed significantly when acoustic cues measured from another animal were presented. This is consistent with the finding that humans localize less accurately when listening to virtual sounds from other subjects. To examine the role of experience in shaping the ability to localize sound, we have studied the behavioural consequences of altering binaural cues by chronically plugging one ear. Ferrets raised and tested with one ear plugged learned to localize as accurately as control animals, which is consistent with previous findings that the representation of auditory space in the midbrain can accommodate abnormal sensory cues during development. Adaptive changes in behaviour were also observed in adults, particularly if they were provided with regular practice in the localization task. Together, these findings suggest that the neural circuits responsible for sound localization can be recalibrated throughout life. Copyright 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11694724     DOI: 10.1159/000046829

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Audiol Neurootol        ISSN: 1420-3030            Impact factor:   1.854


  16 in total

1.  Studies on bilateral cochlear implants at the University of Wisconsin's Binaural Hearing and Speech Laboratory.

Authors:  Ruth Y Litovsky; Matthew J Goupell; Shelly Godar; Tina Grieco-Calub; Gary L Jones; Soha N Garadat; Smita Agrawal; Alan Kan; Ann Todd; Christi Hess; Sara Misurelli
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  Relearning sound localization with a new ear.

Authors:  Marc M Van Wanrooij; A John Van Opstal
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Informational masking and spatial hearing in listeners with and without unilateral hearing loss.

Authors:  Ann M Rothpletz; Frederic L Wightman; Doris J Kistler
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Reduced influence of the ipsilateral ear on spatial tuning of auditory neurons in the albino superior colliculus: a knock-on effect of anomalies of the acoustic chiasm?

Authors:  Simon Grant; K Esther Binns
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-06-27       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Visual influences on ferret auditory cortex.

Authors:  Jennifer K Bizley; Andrew J King
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Bilateral cochlear implantation in the ferret: a novel animal model for behavioral studies.

Authors:  Douglas E H Hartley; Tara Vongpaisal; Jin Xu; Robert K Shepherd; Andrew J King; Amal Isaiah
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2010-05-31       Impact factor: 2.390

7.  Contralateral cochlear effects of ipsilateral damage: no evidence for interaural coupling.

Authors:  Erik Larsen; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  The statistical determinants of adaptation rate in human reaching.

Authors:  Johannes Burge; Marc O Ernst; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Central auditory plasticity after carboplatin-induced unilateral inner ear damage in the chinchilla: up-regulation of GAP-43 in the ventral cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  K S Kraus; D Ding; Y Zhou; R J Salvi
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-05-10       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Improvements of sound localization abilities by the facial ruff of the barn owl (Tyto alba) as demonstrated by virtual ruff removal.

Authors:  Laura Hausmann; Mark von Campenhausen; Frank Endler; Martin Singheiser; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.