Literature DB >> 11694689

Maternal concern about positive test results in universal newborn hearing screening.

V Weichbold1, K Welzl-Mueller.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A positive test result from universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) has been suspected to cause maternal concern. However, findings so far are inconclusive. Against the background of a 2-stage UNHS protocol, we investigated the extent of maternal concern in 2 different situations: 1) mothers' immediate reactions after a positive result at the first-stage test and 2) maternal concern during a 1-month period while waiting for the infant's hearing assessment after the infant also failed the retest (ie, the screening). In addition, we checked whether mothers who are informed by an audiologist about the low predictive validity of positive test results in hearing screening are less concerned about a positive result than mothers who are not informed.
METHODS: A prospective study was conducted over a 1-year period, in which all mothers whose infants tested positive in the first stage or failed the screening were questioned about their level of concern attributable to the positive test result.
RESULTS: Of 85 mothers whose infants tested positive in the first-stage test (situation 1), 34 (40%) did not know the result. Of the remaining 51 mothers, 59% were not at all concerned and 27% were only slightly concerned about the result, whereas 14% stated that they were highly concerned. In an additional sample of 43 mothers whose infants failed the screening (situation 2), 42% reported not being worried and 37% only slightly worried, whereas 21% were highly concerned about the positive screening result. No effect of information about the low predictive validity of positive test results on the extent of maternal concern could be ascertained.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study contradict the findings of some previous surveys that reported considerably higher levels of maternal concern after a positive test in UNHS. The failure to demonstrate the impact of information on maternal concern might be attributable to the fact that the number of uninformed mothers was too small to affect our results perceptibly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11694689     DOI: 10.1542/peds.108.5.1111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  5 in total

1.  Neonatal hearing screening of high-risk infants using automated auditory brainstem response: a retrospective analysis of referral rates.

Authors:  I J McGurgan; N Patil
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 1.568

2.  [Pregnant women's expectations concerning universal newborn hearing screening].

Authors:  L Freund; M Hintermair
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Six month impact of false positives in an Australian infant hearing screening programme.

Authors:  Z Poulakis; M Barker; M Wake
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of a national neonatal hearing screening program in China: conditions for the scale-up.

Authors:  Ruoyan Gai Tobe; Rintaro Mori; Lihui Huang; Lingzhong Xu; Demin Han; Kenji Shibuya
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Newborn hearing screening in the Limiar Clinic in Porto Velho - Rondônia.

Authors:  Marilia Silva e Nunes Botelho; Virgínia Braz da Silva; Luana da Silva Arruda; Isabel Cristiane Kuniyoshi; Lourdes Lebre Redes de Oliveira; Anderson Souza de Oliveira
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.