Literature DB >> 11693884

Development and optimization of polymerase chain reaction-based malaria diagnostic methods and their comparison with quantitative buffy coat assay.

H C Schindler1, L Montenegro, R Montenegro, A B Carvalho, F G Abath, G Jaureguiberry.   

Abstract

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based assays targeting the small-subunit rRNA were developed and evaluated, allowing for the simultaneous diagnosis of Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax DNA in human blood samples. The PCR methods and quantitative buffy coat (QBC) were compared in 402 patients. The heminested PCR method showed a sensitivity of 97.4%, which was superior to the sensitivity of the QBC method (91.7%, P < 0.05), to simple PCR (84.6%, P < 0.001), and to PCR with digoxigenin labeling (PCR-DIG) (88.5%, P < 0.001). The PCR-DIG and QBC analyses were more sensitive than simple PCR (P < 0.003 and P < 0.05, respectively). There was no significant difference between the sensitivities of the QBC assay and the PCR-DIG assay. The specificity for the 3 PCR-based methods was 100%, superior to the specificity calculated for the QBC assay (88.95%, P < 0.009). The frequency of a positive result in groups from endemic areas but without detectable parasitemia increased, in order, from simple PCR, QBC test, PCR-DIG, to heminested PCR. An association between a positive PCR result and a history of malaria was also found. Taken together, these data suggest that this technology could be further developed to screen people with oligoparasitemia and to monitor malaria treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11693884     DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.2001.65.355

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg        ISSN: 0002-9637            Impact factor:   2.345


  4 in total

1.  Newer versus Conventional Methods in the Diagnosis of Malaria: A Comparison.

Authors:  S Datta; B Basu; Y Chandra; A Nagendra
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

2.  How long do rapid diagnostic tests remain positive after anti-malarial treatment?

Authors:  Ursula Dalrymple; Rohan Arambepola; Peter W Gething; Ewan Cameron
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 2.979

3.  Is a Plasmodium lactate dehydrogenase (pLDH) enzyme-linked immunosorbent (ELISA)-based assay a valid tool for detecting risky malaria blood donations in Africa?

Authors:  Pascal S Atchade; Cécile Doderer-Lang; Nicodème Chabi; Sylvie Perrotey; Tamer Abdelrahman; Casimir D Akpovi; Ludovic Anani; André Bigot; Ambaliou Sanni; Ermanno Candolfi
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 2.979

4.  Comparative evaluation of a rapid diagnostic test, an antibody ELISA, and a pLDH ELISA in detecting asymptomatic malaria parasitaemia in blood donors in Buea, Cameroon.

Authors:  Tebit Emmanuel Kwenti; Longdoh Anna Njunda; Beltine Tsamul; Shey Dickson Nsagha; Nguedia Jules-Clement Assob; Kukwah Anthony Tufon; Dilonga Henry Meriki; Enow George Orock
Journal:  Infect Dis Poverty       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 4.520

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.